Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Hank Kerchief

If one believes that courts serve a legitimate purpose, and that under the constitution they are supposed to be triers of fact, then one ought to support the idea that courts may compel testimany. There are exclusions, of course, such as testimony against self or against one’s spouse.


28 posted on 07/07/2009 9:20:18 AM PDT by Tax Government (Sarah NOW.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Tax Government

“If one believes that courts serve a legitimate purpose, and that under the constitution they are supposed to be triers of fact, then one ought to support the idea that courts may compel testimany ...”

The purpose of the Constitution was to establish a system that would ensure the rights to the people The Declaration spelled out and the revolutionary war was fought over, namely: life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

When an innocent man is compelled to do something against his will, he has lost his liberty. It cannot be right to violate an individual’s liberty in the name of liberty.

Bah!

Hank


30 posted on 07/07/2009 10:56:17 AM PDT by Hank Kerchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson