[Wolfie]

Can we cut throught the bullshit for a second? Has there been an administration in the last 50 years that has viewed the Consitution as anything other than optional?

[Jagdgewehr]

Or nearly the last 150 years?

[OKSooner]

Why do you want to obfuscate the matter like that?

-1bama is a Kenyan-born Manchurian President and here you are defending him by saying "They all do it."

I suppose that given the choice, you'd rather see him remain in office than see him gone.

[taxtruth]

BTT!

[spintreebob]

Wolfie,
You speak the truth. Obama is just going farther down the same path his predecessors blazed.
The Congress ignores the enumerated powers of Congress.
The Supreme Court finds Constitutional penumbra in Swedish sociologists.
The President(s) appoint all types of czars without Senate confirmation. The President(s) cut deals on foreign trade with no Senate confirmation.

Obama has just gone farther down the same path.

[Old Teufel Hunden]

The constitution is crystal clear on this. The office of the President negotiates the treaties and the Senate has to ratify them. As far as I know, there has been no treaty that was not ratified by 2/3 of the Senate that we have obeyed.

[LibLieSlayer]

There has never been an muslim marxist or someone who has declared the Constitution as a “FUNDEMENTALLY FLAWED DOCUMENT”... nor has there ever been an enemy of America to serve as President... until hussein... that is NO BULLSHIT!

LLS

[ctdonath2]

Now’s a good time to return to making it mandatory.

[listenhillary]

Has there been a congress in the last 80 years that has viewed the constitution as anything other than optional?

[shibumi]

"Can we cut throught the bullshit for a second? Has there been an administration in the last 50 years that has viewed the Constitution as anything other than optional?"

Well, since you asked .....

There is nothing that the administration or the Congress has done that I view with any binding authority on myself or any other American Citizen. My relationship with the Federal Government is parallel to the one that existed between the Colonies and the King of England in 1775 - except that the aforementioned had greater traditional legitimacy.

Now, they are expecting us to take them seriously when they have a third-rate comic from SNL pass on the qualifications of a Supreme Court Justice?

No one needs a Paul Revere to tell them how the oppressors are coming - Wyatt's Torch is lit.