Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘One handgun a month’ state bill passes - Reactions mixed across Hudson County (NJ)
Hudson Reporter ^ | June 5, 2009 | Ricardo Kaulessar

Posted on 07/06/2009 8:45:10 PM PDT by neverdem

Gun dealers in New Jersey may have to limit handgun sales to one gun per customer per month if Gov. Jon Corzine signs a controversial law the state Senate passed on June 27, a measure that had its start in Jersey City.

The “One Handgun a Month” bill was originally an ordinance proposed by Jersey City Mayor Jerramiah Healy and adopted by the City Council in June 2006. The intent was to cut down on “straw purchases,” legal bulk purchases of handguns which are then illegally sold to individuals who have not passed background checks for a license.

The city ordinance was challenged in state Supreme Court by Jersey City gun dealer Frank Caso with help from the National Rifle Association.

It was struck down in December 2006 by Hudson County Superior Court Judge Maurice Gallipoli. He ruled the ordinance subjected gun dealers and buyers in Jersey City to a different standard than their counterparts in the rest of the state.

The city appealed the decision only to have the New Jersey Appellate Division uphold the Superior Court’s ruling in September 2008. The city has asked the New Jersey Supreme Court to overturn the Appellate Court’s decision, and the case is still pending.

In the meantime, in January 2008, the ordinance was crafted into a bill introduced in the state Assembly by Assemblywoman Joan Quigley (D-32nd). It took over a year for passage by the Assembly then by the Senate, where it was approved by a 21-15 vote. State Senators including Hudson County Sandra Bolden Cunningham (who sponsored the bill in the Senate), Brian Stack, and Nicholas Sacco were among the affirmative votes.

Now it awaits Corzine’s signature to become law. Healy hopes the governor will sign the bill in Jersey City during the summer.

“This is such an important bill because it cuts down on one source,” Healy said, “the straw man who walks into a gun shop and buys more than one handgun.”

But Caso hopes Corzine thinks twice about signing the bill. Corzine could conditionally veto it (returning it to the legislature for changes) or veto it absolutely.

Caso has operated Caso’s Gun-A-Rama on Danforth Avenue for 42 years. He is the only gun dealer currently in Hudson County.

‘Feel good’ legislation not good

The ordinance does not apply to federal, state, or local law enforcement officers or agencies, people who are licensed to collect guns as historic relics, or to transfers of handguns between licensed retail dealers.

Those stipulations do little to quell the continuing argument between gun control advocates and proponents of the Second Amendment right to bear arms, which was affirmed in June 2008 by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Bayonne Police Det. Vincent LoBue is a 42-year police officer and an instructor at the Bayonne Pistol Range on 16th Street in Bayonne. LoBue didn’t know the bill had passed when he was contacted for an interview, and he was not impressed. LoBue said the bill penalizes not just the gun buyers, but also gun sellers.

“Basically, no one likes it and to me it is ‘feel good’ legislation,” LoBue said. “We already have the toughest handgun laws in the country.”

LoBue continued, “Instead of going after the law-abiding citizens, go after the criminals who will find a way around the law to buy guns illegally.”

For a New Jersey resident to purchase a handgun from a gun dealer, they must prove residency, then contact the local Police Department, which does an extensive background check. Then the State Police do a background check, followed by the federal government. A permit is often issued within 30 days, although it sometimes takes longer.

A practical matter

Hudson County Prosecutor Edward DeFazio said he is sympathetic to gun owners and collectors, and thinks the recently passed bill will not have an adverse effect on their right to purchase firearms.

“Nobody is trying to keep the sportsman from pursuing their hobby,” DeFazio said. “And this is not about people not being allowed to keep firearms.”

However, DeFazio has long lamented the number of homicides in Hudson County, especially in Jersey City. As of the end of last week, there were 16 homicides in Jersey City this year, 13 of them committed with a firearm.

DeFazio said, “The question that should be asked is, ‘Why does anyone have to purchase more than one handgun a month?’ ”

Ricardo Kaulessar can be reached at rkaulessar@hudsonrreporter.com.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: banglist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 07/06/2009 8:45:10 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Now it’s one gun a month ...

Next it’s one gun a year ...

Next it’s one gun a lifetime ...

...

I think you all see where this camel’s nose under the tent thingy is going.


2 posted on 07/06/2009 8:48:07 PM PDT by webschooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus; jocon307; Alberta's Child; Pharmboy; Calpernia; Malsua; dead; nj26; OldFriend; Clemenza; ...
BANG! I'll be shocked if Corzine doesn't sign it.
3 posted on 07/06/2009 8:48:49 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Tony Soprano must be worried sick.


4 posted on 07/06/2009 8:49:16 PM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Nobody is trying to keep the sportsman from pursuing their hobby,” DeFazio said. “And this is not about people not being allowed to keep firearms.”

However, DeFazio has long lamented the number of homicides in Hudson County, especially in Jersey City. As of the end of last week, there were 16 homicides in Jersey City this year, 13 of them committed with a firearm.

DeFazio said, “The question that should be asked is, ‘Why does anyone have to purchase more than one handgun a month?’

Why don’t they put such restrictions on the stupid libs Free Speech...They would howel bloody murder....Why would anyone need to use their free speech more than once a month?

Because were suppossed to be free in this country not run like a nanny state...You Baffoon


5 posted on 07/06/2009 8:49:16 PM PDT by jakerobins ( NO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Another feel good bill... Well, at least the wonderful local government prohibited multiple sales to individuals. This is one of those “feel good” laws that have nothing to do with crime or other limiting laws for firearms...


6 posted on 07/06/2009 8:50:28 PM PDT by Deagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ozzymandus

Yeah, that’s really gonna put a dent in Tony’s and his gang’s lifestyle ain’t it?


7 posted on 07/06/2009 8:50:28 PM PDT by webschooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
“The question that should be asked is, ‘Why does anyone have to purchase more than one handgun a month?’ ”

Why should anyone have to ANSWER to you or EXPLAIN WHY they wish to buy more than one gun a month, asswipe? It's NONE of your GD business WHAT I BUY, WHEN, IN WHAT QUANTITY or WHY, JERK!
8 posted on 07/06/2009 8:52:28 PM PDT by Mister Muggles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

One gun a month is fine with me. I will never buy that many guns, but I will now try my hardest to do so.

Letsee now...I’ve been alive for somewhere around 500 months and I currently only own somewhere less than 50. So I got 450 guns coming to me before the end of the month just to get my limit.

Right?

This is gonna be pert near impossible!


9 posted on 07/06/2009 8:57:35 PM PDT by mamelukesabre (Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum (If you want peace prepare for war))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ozzymandus
Should somebody named Tony need to purchase firearms, my close and dear cousin Guido may be able to provide what he needs. At a premium, I'm afraid, but everyting is available.

/johnny

10 posted on 07/06/2009 8:57:49 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (God Bless us all, each, and every one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Well, at least their not “infringing” on any rights
11 posted on 07/06/2009 8:58:10 PM PDT by Las Vegas Ron (zer0 is doing to capitalism what Kennedy did to health care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Pretty soon, cemeteries will be a common place for the peasants & subjects in the State of New Jack-the-Ripper thanks to those nanny-loving people.


12 posted on 07/06/2009 8:58:29 PM PDT by greatdefender (If You Want Peace.....Prepare For War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

New Jersians (sp?) now have to buy one gun a month? How can everyone afford to do that?

/sarc


13 posted on 07/06/2009 8:59:46 PM PDT by Disambiguator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mister Muggles

Vote the bastard OUT and anybody else that agrees with him.
Come on America quit wimpin out.Fight for what you want.The leftards always like trashing, let’s give’em some payback.


14 posted on 07/06/2009 9:00:22 PM PDT by Slimey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: webschooner
I think you all see where this camel’s nose under the tent thingy is going.

SCOTUS has Second Amendment cases waiting for it in the fall already. The NRA is one of the parties. I wonder if they will also challenge this.

16 posted on 07/06/2009 9:01:02 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Getting beyond the unconstitutional gun grabbing nature of the bill, what idiot believes you can stop crime by only limiting people to one gun a month?

It would be funny if it wasn’t so stupid and statist.


17 posted on 07/06/2009 9:01:11 PM PDT by spikeytx86 (Pray for Democrats for they have been brainwashed by their fruity little club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
A Permit is now required to exercise your God Given Rights as an American Citizen. Who woulda thunk it?
18 posted on 07/06/2009 9:04:47 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (One Man's Messiah is another Man's Fuhrer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
This has nothing to do with limiting handgun sales.

It's a Trojan Horse. They want folks to say that it sounds reasonable (even though unconstitutional.)

Then, having established that such limits are okay, they can rev up the controls, with the ultimate goals of total sales bans then confiscation.

The purpose is also to harass gun dealers.

.

One handgun a month? How about law-abiding and tax-paying New Jersians substituting one moving van...once?

.

19 posted on 07/06/2009 9:08:02 PM PDT by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spikeytx86
what idiot believes you can stop crime by only limiting people to one gun a month?

The kind of idiot that believes you need two guns to shoot two people.

Of course, that's not the lying, gun-grabbing fascists behind the bill. It's the idiots in Jersey who vote for them.

20 posted on 07/06/2009 9:10:41 PM PDT by WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson