If I remember correctly, didn’t some official with Hawaii Records Dept say that the certification of live birth that is posted online is legitimate and acceptable as proof of birth?
If so, what some creative Hawaiian freeper needs to do is to submit a “certification of live birth” just like the one Obama posted, only put their name in (and maybe their father’s) but leave his mother’s name. That would make them his half sibling, and eligible to request his BC.
Since someone in the Hawaii dept of records has already said that the certificate posted online was legitimate, how could they refuse a similar document as proof of relationship if they say it is OK as proof of Zero’s citizenship? If they claim the new document is forged, doesn’t that admit the possibility of O’s being forged, too?
Just trying to keep the pot stirred.....
Love,
O2
No they did not. She said it "looked like" one of theirs. She did sort of say that her boss was saying it was legitimate, but that was later retracted, since saying it was legitimate is as "illegal" as giving out the "COLB" or a copy of the Long Form BC, which they do say they have on file, without saying what information it contains.