I extended you the courtesy of providing three areas of study which demonstrate the validity of the theory of evolution. Rather than address them, you disingenuously ignore those items and ask for others. When I stated that the fossil record demonstrates the theory of evolution, I wasn't talking about just the horse fossil record, or the turtle fossil record. I mean the whole fossil record. That's why its such a powerful piece of evidence, and that's why your desire to cherry-pick certain species is a clearly a dodge. If you want to argue why the three areas actually support your notion of young earth creationism, then do it. But don't just keep asking for different responses when you've already received direct answers. That's not only rude, but very dishonest.
Then, you utterly fail to respond to my request for just *one* are a of science that supports your contention that the earth is only a few thousand years old. Weak, DLR. Very weak.
Out of curiosity, it this a "lot of words just avoid admitting that you haven't actually taken any courses in those areas"...?
No. Unlike you, I've taken (and bothered to learn from) undergraduate courses in earth sciences, biology, astronomy, and anthropology. I'm merely acknowledging that I am not a professional scientist, but unlike YEC's such as yourself, I at least make an honest effort to understand their work. Seriously, DLR...do yourself a favor and pick up a good science journal some time and give it a read. You may be surprised that you actually *like* learning about the world around you instead of just arguing with people who already have.
Have you ever received a response to this? I know I've asked it many times here and on other forums and I never get an answer. It seems like a simple question.