Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dakota Dino Reveals Skin Cells (first they find dino blood &vessels, now they find dino skin cells!)
CEH ^ | July 1, 2009

Posted on 07/06/2009 8:50:37 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-176 next last
To: editor-surveyor

For an “editor” (LOL!) your reading comprehension skills sure are lacking.


41 posted on 07/06/2009 10:40:13 AM PDT by Travis T. OJustice (I can spell just fine, thanks, it's my typing that sucks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Blackacre
Water is not a low-oxygen environment.

Water itself may not be, but during a cataclysmic flood, it can create that type of environment. To wit, 1500 Guatemalans were buried in a mudslide caused by a few days of torrential rains. So I guess we both could be correct (landslide caused by lots of water).

The point is this: it is all conjecture and either conclusion is an act of faith because we weren't there to witness the event.

42 posted on 07/06/2009 10:40:41 AM PDT by 1forall (America - my home, my land, my country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Travis T. OJustice
"But no legitimate scientific evidence?"

You have no idea what scientific evidence is, do you!

Stop wasting my time with your childish 'gotcha' posts.

43 posted on 07/06/2009 10:41:08 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Travis T. OJustice

The only thing lacking here is your honesty.


44 posted on 07/06/2009 10:42:55 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: LoneRangerMassachusetts
Where in the Bible do the authors speak of dinosaurs dying out 6,000 years ago?

It doesn't. But this discovery still requires a scientific explanation.
45 posted on 07/06/2009 10:44:16 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
How could soft tissue structures and details survive intact for 66 million years?...

You know the answer, 66 million years is total BS that's how, off by about 66 million years give or take 10,000 years
46 posted on 07/06/2009 10:44:35 AM PDT by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rjsimmon

God created evolution and time.
Back to work...


47 posted on 07/06/2009 10:46:41 AM PDT by Andy from Chapel Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

You clearly don’t have any idea what truthfulness and honesty are, do you. Quit being sleazy with the lack of facts, be a little honest, and you may have a chance of being taken seriously.

Quit wasting my time with statements and outright lies you’ll never be able to back up. “Go to some thread from a few Thursdays ago” is hardly posting factual detail, that’s dishonest, lazy, sleazy chicanery.


48 posted on 07/06/2009 10:47:32 AM PDT by Travis T. OJustice (I can spell just fine, thanks, it's my typing that sucks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
The only thing lacking here is your honesty.

That is riotously humorous coming from the poster of a sleaze campaign. Back up your statements, or be shown to be a liar.

49 posted on 07/06/2009 10:49:04 AM PDT by Travis T. OJustice (I can spell just fine, thanks, it's my typing that sucks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Blackacre
"And the T-Rex “soft tissue” doesn’t count, as all of the organic content there was replaced with minerals."

That is a flat out lie that has been completely refuted here. The pickling of the samples produced unfossilized true soft tissue.

50 posted on 07/06/2009 10:49:13 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Travis T. OJustice

You are here only to deflect factual and honest presentations. - You are completely dishonest and disingenuous in all your posts. I have no intention in engaging your foolishness and falsehoods; please stop posting to me. You are not a legitimate part of this discussion.


51 posted on 07/06/2009 10:53:07 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
That is a flat out lie that has been completely refuted here.

On an internet chat board? Unlikely.

The pickling of the samples produced unfossilized true soft tissue.

No, it didn't. Go back and read what's been happening with the supposed "soft tissue" in the interim. No real soft tissue was ever found in the sample.

52 posted on 07/06/2009 11:05:56 AM PDT by Blackacre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

“Marco Polo wrote of the “dragons” he encountered, as did Alexander. Are you going to write them off?”

My cousin says he played racquetball with Elvis and Michael Jackson yesterday. Are you going to write him off?


53 posted on 07/06/2009 11:08:08 AM PDT by Buck W. (The President of the United States IS named Schickelgruber...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
You are here only to deflect factual and honest presentations.

LMAO, no, once again, you lie. I am TRYING to get you to post factual and honest presentations yet you refuse to make any, only spurious, unsubstantiated drivel.

I have taken no position, so your comment about posting falsehoods is clearly more sleazy chicanery.

Just post your "evidence" and then we can have a discussion, until you do so, it's you who is "here only to deflect factual and honest presentations. - You are completely dishonest and disingenuous in all your posts." and are not a legitimate part of this discussion because you refuse to back up your spurious assertions with anything resembling fact.

54 posted on 07/06/2009 11:11:12 AM PDT by Travis T. OJustice (I can spell just fine, thanks, it's my typing that sucks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: rjsimmon
Do you believe in flying saucers? (i.e. extra-terrestrials)?

I think it's almost certain that we're not the only life in the universe. But I don't think there's any real evidence that aliens have ever visited our planet.

Further, if these creatures did indeed evolve, and are presumably farther along the evolutionary ladder, would they not be able to travel extra-solar system?

There really is no such thing as "further along on the evolutionary ladder." But, all of our current science suggests that there is no way to travel faster than light. So, even a highly-advanced alien species could not undertake interstellar travel very easily. Furthermore, the idea that aliens have visited us assumes they have the same motivations we do (travel, exploratatiom, trade etc.) Aliens may exist, but have zero interest in us.

55 posted on 07/06/2009 11:12:26 AM PDT by Blackacre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: 1forall
The point is this: it is all conjecture and either conclusion is an act of faith because we weren't there to witness the event.

All we can do is draw conclusions based on the available evidence. And the fact is, there is no available evidence of a global flood.

56 posted on 07/06/2009 11:14:14 AM PDT by Blackacre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Buck W.

If he’s your cousin, definately!


57 posted on 07/06/2009 11:16:43 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Blackacre

Hey noobie, go back and read the threads here. your position is the same as a number of lunaticks here that try the same tricks as you do, and has been completely demolished here.


58 posted on 07/06/2009 11:19:08 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor

You keep making claims, but provide no evidence.

And calling someone a “noobie” is the last resort of an internet poster who knows he’s lost.


59 posted on 07/06/2009 11:23:17 AM PDT by Blackacre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
lunaticks

For an editor, maybe you should borrow my tagline.

Got your "evidence" posted yet? Oh yeah, it must not exist.

60 posted on 07/06/2009 11:24:42 AM PDT by Travis T. OJustice (I can spell just fine, thanks, it's my typing that sucks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-176 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson