Rush Limbaugh Responds To Palin's Resignation

YouTube/RadioEqualizer ^ | July 4, 2009 | by Brian Maloney

[MaestroLC]

Once again, just because you know of no "evidence" doesn't mean it's not there. And "childish insults" are the only ones I excel in. Sorry.

LOL. Well my FRiend, that is your privilege as a poster to say what is on your mind. ;)

I will take your Kristol statement more seriously when you provide the some proof he said what you say he said. You said it, so you are the one obligated to back it up in some way.

[UCANSEE2]

Whenever I get to feeling like that, I just think of Monty Python’s LIFE OF BRIAN, and Jesus singing on the cross.

ALWAYS LOOK ON THE BRIGHT SIDE OF LIFE!

[Servant of the Cross]

THREAD HI-JACKER!!!

[Deb]

You’re the one who heard it, it’s up to you to disprove it.

[Lauren BaRecall]

It’s just you.

Sarah does not need the media. The media will discover that it needs *her*.

[ejonesie22]

Love that.

BTW, I just found out Jesus was from Alaska.

(Don't ask)

[UCANSEE2]

“My contrarian take is, almost everyone I talk to thinks it’s crazy, but I wonder maybe it’s crazy like a fox,” said Bill Kristol, editor of the Weekly Standard, who has been defending Palin this past week.

From The Washington Post.

(my new FIREFOX 3.5 browser won’t let me cut and paste a link)

[Lauren BaRecall]

LOL! And yep, I do!

[timestax]

[Deb]

Wow, are you enjoying the lime or cherry Kool-Aid?

[ejonesie22]

I am just pathetic...

[Deb]

Yep, Kristol (as I mentioned), is one-in-a-row.

[Sylvester McMonkey McBean]

It might be possible to do both, but why? When one message is guaranteed to to be accurate (public direct), and another cannot be guaranteed (via traditional MSM outlets); does it make sense to expend effort to disperse an important message through channels where accuracy cannot be guaranteed?

It could be argued that yes non-guaranteed messages are necessary only because they reach a different audience. However, the messages delivered through the non-guaranteed channels must be of a single very specific, tightly knit idea. In effect a soundbite. Anything more is subject to spin. So, in summary if the non-guarenteed channels are to be used, and I believe they should...any messages over this medium should be - "pre-soundbited" so they cannot be further reduced to a smaller soundbite under the guise of "news analysis" or a "message summary" by some Lefty talking head.

[Lauren BaRecall]

You two guys! It’s as plain as day that you’re on the same side. Just a misunderstanding. Now shake hands! :-)

[trisham]

Wow, are you enjoying the lime or cherry Kool-Aid?

*******************

I'm enjoying a martini. How about you, Lauren?

[spacejunkie01]

uhhhhh...Bill Kristol is STILL her supporter. He’s consulting with her. Now, name the names of people that were all in love with her until she made this move and are now disappointed....

[MaestroLC]

You’re the one who heard it, it’s up to you to disprove it.

LMAO. Of course that's illogical and absurd, but thank you for the laugh. I enjoyed reading that. :)

Check and mate by me.

[trisham]

You two guys! It’s as plain as day that you’re on the same side. Just a misunderstanding.

Now shake hands! :-)

********************

I second that!

[Jackson57]

Lauren, how about if I give you a hug and you pass it along to RasterMaster? ;-{)

[Jackson57]

I just noticed you sig line ... Good stuff!