Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: stevie_d_64

Governor Perry - please don’t disappoint....can someone explain what has gone on here?


2 posted on 07/05/2009 8:00:59 AM PDT by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Freedom'sWorthIt

BAck in the 2007 Texas legislative session, the powers at be decided it might be a good idea to shelve the TTC (Trans Texas Corridor) because of the overwhelming negative support for it once the details got out about it...

Some of us knew it was going to come back either full bore, or covertly to continue work on it...

The funding mechanisms to do this were tabbed CDA’s (Comprehensive Development Agreements) and PPS’s (Public/Private Agreements)...Those mechanismas were embedded within the TxDOT’s (Texas Department of Transportation) funding for the next two years...

This special session was to pull the woll over folks who were not paying attention...So this group called TURF, and a few of us grassroots folks stepped up and burned up the phonelines, visited with our state elected officials before the special session and they then took it back to Austin...

They successfully neutered the TxDOT funding to take away the ability to continue work above or below radar on the TTC...

Which is basically what Texans want...

As much as I am about a 50/50 supporter of Gov. Perry...He can go pound sand on this issue...

I am also of the opinion that it is unlikely, although we are continuing to call his office and our state reps and senastors to call another special session to address another few issues like:

Voter ID

Employer Parking lot bill (A pro CHL bill)

and the Campus Carry bill (another pro-gun, pro CHL bill)

Gov. Perry may lete us stew on that since we cut the TTC off at the knees..

But we’ll have to see...


3 posted on 07/05/2009 8:12:11 AM PDT by stevie_d_64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Freedom'sWorthIt
My guess is that some people want the government to subsidize travel by automobile, and so celebrate the end of road privatization. There could be a number of other things in this that aren’t clearly stated, like maybe property rights issues or not reducing taxes already designated for roads. Not very clear, though.
4 posted on 07/05/2009 8:13:25 AM PDT by In veno, veritas (Please identify my Ad Hominem attacks. I should be debating ideas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson