To: Niteflyr
Every positive comment I have read on FR about Sarah Palin matches almost word for word the positive comments made here and elsewhere about G.W. Bush before he announced.
“Another Reagan, the real deal, a true conservative, energizes the base, etc”. All said about G.W. and all said because the “base” was desperate for someone, ANYONE to end the Clinton dynasty (i.e. Al Gore).
I'm seeing it all again.
62 posted on
07/04/2009 7:46:09 AM PDT by
M.K. Borders
(All I require of my government is the liberty my Grandfathers were born to.)
To: M.K. Borders
BUsh was elected twice...and brought in a majority in the House and Seante. It is their fault that they did not perform and stand by Conservative principles when given the chance.
I do not believe for an instant that Sarah or those who come in with her will repeat those mistakes.
At the very least, given the state of affairs now, with an abhject marxist in the White Hosue abetted by majorities of the same in the Hosue and Seante...I pray we get the chance to try.
66 posted on
07/04/2009 7:49:26 AM PDT by
Jeff Head
(Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
To: M.K. Borders
the base was desperate for someone, ANYONE to end the Clinton dynastyOne thing is for sure we will be desperate to get this socialist hate-monger out of the WH one way or the other....
67 posted on
07/04/2009 7:49:39 AM PDT by
Niteflyr
("Just because something is free doesn't mean it's good for you".)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson