Bullcrap. You made sweeping generalizations, so sweeping that they became lies.
So you could say I am one person who doesnt fit that example, but accusations of lying are a bit belligerent.
Hardly. You were caught spewing b.s., and now you whine about me calling you for it.
I made a general observation, to which of course there are exceptions like yourself.
General? No, you are taking the typical establishment Republican (otherwise known as RINO) approach towards Palin - that only redneck rubes like her.
You act as though Im talking about you personally. Not everything is about you. You are neither the center of the universe, nor a typical former Fred supporter.
Calling you on your lies is hardly making this about me. Instead, it's pointing out what YOU are - typical RINO slime.
Duncan Hunters following mostly went to Huckabee.
Hunter endorsed the Huckster when he dropped out.
Fred Thompsons supporters mostly went to Romney when he dropped out. So the notion that the venomously anti-Romney PalinChoir are former Fred supporters doesnt wash.
Freds supporters had malice towards none. (I guess I stand corrected here, some aparently are seething with malice)
Plus most of us who supported Fred did so because of his deep experience, wisdom, and knowledge on the issues.
That is the antithesis of the Palin phenomenon. Her most vocal supporters are from the evangelical camp, same as Huckabees.
I will buy the whole Duncan Hunter connection. Their stubborn refusal to give up on a no-shot candidate and to viciously trash all the other candidates who actually had a chance seems to be a pattern theyve brought with them to the PalinChoir.