[Virginia Ridgerunner]

I've told you once before and I'll tell you again----none of us are, nor were we ever, on the Huckster bandwagon. The major part of Palin's support on this forum comes from folks who either supported Duncan Hunter (like me) or Fred Thompson. I challenge you to prove otherwise. So, get your facts straight before you throw out that non-sense.

BTW, I see that you and cedric have made friends. How appropriate. You deserve each other.

[Cedric]

I've long known ya don't know how to think.

Now, it turns out you don't know how to read either.

I see that you and cedric have made friends

Have a 3rd retarded grader read the last line of #116 to you.

[counterpunch]

Duncan Hunter’s following mostly went to Huckabee.
Hunter endorsed the Huckster when he dropped out.

Fred Thompson’s supporters mostly went to Romney when he dropped out. So the notion that the venomously anti-Romney PalinChoir are former Fred supporters doesn’t wash. Fred’s supporters had malice towards none.

Plus most of us who supported Fred did so because of his deep experience, wisdom, and knowledge on the issues. That is the antithesis of the Palin phenomenon. Her most vocal supporters are from the evangelical camp, same as Huckabees.

I will buy the whole Duncan Hunter connection. Their stubborn refusal to give up on a no-shot candidate and to viciously trash all the other candidates who actually had a chance seems to be a pattern they’ve brought with them to the PalinChoir.

Even now that she is finished politically, they are still beating their drums.

[4Godsoloved..Hegave]

I agree that most on FR that have backed the potential candidacy of Sarah Palin as President were probably backers of Duncan or Fred. I personally wanted Duncan as President and Palin as VP. All anybody heard that backed Duncan was he can’t win. No name recognition, not enough money even though he consistently had best answers for America at the debates. If everybody spent time backing him instead of giving all the reasons he couldn’t win it would have been a closer race and the conservative principals would have had their day.

What I am wondering about is those that are the most vocal about Palin in a negative way are just as afraid of her popularity as the Dems are. In other words they do not want a conservative President. They want a moderate. To rip Palin on this latest move she made is just a different day, different hour, different issue than what they did to her 48 hours ago. Similar as the naysayers of Duncan around here except Sarah Palin has hit a grand slam with the PEOPLE and the money usually follows such popularity. So now the moderate Republicans must find other reasons to bring Palin down, no mercy, no consideration, no understanding.

It would be nice if Freepers would identify their ideology more clearly instead if ripping potential candidates in the Republican party to pieces. All because they do not agree with their policies and beliefs about Governments role in their lives.

The Republican party is a very big tent. I am clearly a Solid Conservative and Sarah Palin is the only one out there that comes close to representing my beliefs about Government. I am waiting on other Conservatives to show up.