Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: angkor

unfortunately, as I posted the day after the election, there has only been one person who lost in the election for Vice President only to be elected President in the last century, that was FDR.


79 posted on 07/03/2009 7:26:31 PM PDT by Perdogg (Sarah Palin-Jim DeMint 2012 - Liz Cheney for Sec of State - Duncan Hunter SecDef)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: Perdogg

>>> unfortunately, as I posted the day after the election, there has only been one person who lost in the election for Vice President only to be elected President in the last century, that was FDR. <<<<

That’s interesting.

And unconvincing, even to this Palin sceptic.

Sounds like the kind of factoid a Beltway talking head would be touting.


82 posted on 07/03/2009 7:29:03 PM PDT by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

To: Perdogg

Right.
And FDR did not run against the President he had lost to just 4 years earlier.
FDR’s election was no rematch. Just as Nixon’s second run wasn’t a rematch either. Both Nixon and FDR waited at least 8 years and for a totally different ticket to run against.

But Dewey, Stevenson, and Mondale all ran in rematches of one form or another, and all lost. And by bigger margins the second time around.

Running one of your losing candidates against the ticket they already lost to 4 years ago amounts to political surrender for a party.


90 posted on 07/03/2009 7:38:35 PM PDT by counterpunch (In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem. Government is the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson