Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 2ndDivisionVet
The article is full of patronizing BS.

The party of Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, Eisenhower, and (the pragmatic version of) Reagan is the path to a Republican resurgence. Palin is nowhere on that radar. She is all about celebrity status and controversy.

Gibberish. In several ways.

4 posted on 07/02/2009 9:34:15 PM PDT by SolidWood (Down with the islamic regime! Freedom for Iran!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SolidWood

The article is from a Canada.

Macleans does not understand Conservatives.


17 posted on 07/02/2009 9:42:03 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Reagan Republican for Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: SolidWood

yeah, this author seems full of it...


292 posted on 07/02/2009 11:58:58 PM PDT by fabian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: SolidWood

“She is all about celebrity status and controversy”
=== a classic example of the meathead myopia that passes for commentary, yet is nothing more than Freud’s concept of
“projection”. The Media, from the beginning, saw everything that was honest , direct and ethical about her as its opposite: “parading” her kids,especially the baby around in front of the public as a desperate plea for sympathy is just what a Liberal would’ve done, if that liberal hadn’t aborted that child in the first place.
I could go on for pages, but I just woke up my wife, and will have to go back to bed.


527 posted on 07/03/2009 3:32:08 AM PDT by supremedoctrine ( YOUR AD IN THIS SPACE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson