To: counterpunch
Perhaps if the race had been close, then Palin supporters could have some credibility to their claims. But it wasn’t. It wasn’t even close to being close. Either Palin can pull in the votes, or she can’t. People had to opportunity to choose her over 0bama, and they passed by the millions.I can't speak for anyone else but because of Sarah Palin, MCCain got two votes from my home...Without Sarah, MCCain would have gotten zero votes from my home...
129 posted on
07/02/2009 10:53:56 PM PDT by
Iscool
(I don't understand all that I know...)
To: Iscool
I can't speak for anyone else but because of Sarah Palin, MCCain got two votes from my home...Without Sarah, MCCain would have gotten zero votes from my home... Ditto...
131 posted on
07/02/2009 10:55:07 PM PDT by
Niteflyr
("Just because something is free doesn't mean it's good for you".)
To: Iscool
Right, all 58,343,671 votes were for Palin.
And they were about 10 million short.
So why do we want to revisit that again?
Everyone knows it was really a Palin vs. 0bama election.
We said it back then. Everyone said it back then.
So why do we want a rematch after already losing that race once before?
151 posted on
07/02/2009 11:04:20 PM PDT by
counterpunch
(In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem. Government is the problem.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson