Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Energy Leninism - Is the Democratic Party's energy policy overreach setting up another 1994?
Reason ^ | June 30, 2009 | Ronald Bailey

Posted on 07/01/2009 12:54:55 PM PDT by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 07/01/2009 12:54:55 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Yes!


2 posted on 07/01/2009 12:59:29 PM PDT by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Possibly, but I have no confidence that anything will truly change. All that will happen is we will slow down the growth of government on the environmental/tax side. But are things really going to change?

The GOP won’t get rid of Homeland Security or the Dept. of Education or pull the plug on a myriad of disasterous programs. They won’t stop the march of the DOMESTIC terror grid or even the death of the internet.

It is certainly better than Obama, but only marginally compared to what should be done.


3 posted on 07/01/2009 1:03:29 PM PDT by Crimson Elephant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

"Energy Leninism - Is the Democratic Party's energy policy overreach setting up another 1994?"

Yes. Their global warming puritanism will be their undoing.

4 posted on 07/01/2009 1:05:15 PM PDT by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

With that nutjob Franken now in, we have no “hope” for “change”...........


5 posted on 07/01/2009 1:05:46 PM PDT by Red Badger (Inquiring minds want to know, but American Idol minds could care less...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crimson Elephant
It is certainly better than Obama, but only marginally compared to what should be done.

Agreed but it is what it is and you go to war with the army you have. No?

6 posted on 07/01/2009 1:07:33 PM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

If the RNC can’t fix the primary process we are doomed. It couldn’t be more harmful to the GOP if the DNC wrote the rules.


7 posted on 07/01/2009 1:09:33 PM PDT by Dutch Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Given the Republican Party's current disarray, it's unlikely that 2010 will see another "Republican Revolution."

Word.

8 posted on 07/01/2009 1:12:11 PM PDT by bill1952 (Power is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

>Agreed but it is what it is and you go to war with the army you have. No?

It is what it is, and they won’t do snot, let alone go to war.
Be very afraid - reality is staring at us with an evil glint in it’s eye.


9 posted on 07/01/2009 1:14:41 PM PDT by bill1952 (Power is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dutch Boy

Yeah... I really hate the whole idea of open primaries. The idea is to try to increase membership but why? If someone wants to vote in a primary they should join the party in advance - not on the day of the primary and then withdraw on the same day. Is that a party rule or a state rule?


10 posted on 07/01/2009 1:15:41 PM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bill1952
Be very afraid - reality is staring at us with an evil glint in it’s eye.

Maybe I'm still fooling myself but I stsill have some faith in Americans. I've been listening to quite a few gripes from Democrats about Obama "taking over everything". With continued economic stagflation, high unemployment, $6 a gallon gasoline and few more international crises due to an incoherent foreign policy... maybe that damn sleeping giant will finally wake up again.

11 posted on 07/01/2009 1:20:30 PM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rhombus
Maybe I'm still fooling myself but I stsill have some faith in Americans

Maybe...

12 posted on 07/01/2009 1:22:59 PM PDT by bill1952 (Power is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy; Joe Brower; Cannoneer No. 4; Criminal Number 18F; Dan from Michigan; Eaker; Jeff Head; ...
I forgot about that BTU tax that the Clintonistas also proposed in their gun grabbing and healthcare overreaching that led to their 1994 debacle. Gun grabbing appears off the table legislatively, apart from Sotomayor's confirmation, but energy and healthcare are back, and Obama is making a mess in foreign affairs too! Now with Franken about to be seated, the rats have the whole ball of wax!

Sen. Inhofe Calls for Inquiry Into 'Suppressed' Climate Change Report

Obama Toughens Rules for Some Lighting

The ugly face of liberalism Honduras & Iran hypocrisy

GOA Applauds Call to Action on Judge Sotomayor from NRA's Past President

Some noteworthy articles about politics, foreign or military affairs, IMHO, FReepmail me if you want on or off my list.

13 posted on 07/01/2009 1:26:01 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

(setting up another 1994?)

Not this time, our Republic has been overthrown, it was just so quiet it didn’t even stop the ‘sheep’ from grazing.

Don’t hang your hopes on 2010 elections, by then, a perilous national security emergency will have been declared and the elections will be ‘suspended’.

Oh, don’t worry, it will be just temporary. /s


14 posted on 07/01/2009 1:26:12 PM PDT by RetSignman (DEMSM: "If you tell a big enough lie, frequently enough, it becomes the truth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Is the Democratic Party's energy policy overreach setting up another 1994?

I don't think so, but I think the overreach on health care will. Hillarycare's threat to the health care system was, IMHO, the reason for the 1994 blowback. It's very personal to the voters, in a way abstract economics is not.

15 posted on 07/01/2009 1:27:55 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (Pretending the Admin Moderator doesn't exist will result in suspension.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

Things were very glum when I graduated from college... then we had morning in America.


16 posted on 07/01/2009 1:36:09 PM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RetSignman
Not this time, our Republic has been overthrown, it was just so quiet it didn’t even stop the ‘sheep’ from grazing.

You and others of your ilk are way too pessimistic. He's also badly overreaching on immigration too. IMHO, the rats will destroy themselves in 2010.

Immigration Reform [aka Amnesty] Still on Radar

Our Melting President

17 posted on 07/01/2009 1:41:07 PM PDT by neverdem (Xin loi minh oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
It is critically important that we fight this bill BECAUSE it is Leninist - not because of taxes, or energy, or climate, or jobs.

1994 WAS 1994 because the Clintons evinced the intention to regulate every aspect of our private lives and our property from Washington. THe vasy coalition that threw out the Democrats could never have arisen around any issue other than the Blessings of Liberty for ourselves and our Posterity.

18 posted on 07/01/2009 1:43:44 PM PDT by Jim Noble (Pas d'ennmis a droit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

No. Not yet. Not enough pain for enough people — YET.

Besides, the asumption here is that we won’t have some kind of “emergency” or “crisis” that will indefinitely “delay” the 2010 election. I make NO such assumptions with this bunch.


19 posted on 07/01/2009 1:51:41 PM PDT by patriot preacher (To be a good American Citizen and a Christian IS NOT a contradiction. (www.mygration.blogspot.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

In 1994 Billious Clintonus did not have ACORN in charge of elections.


20 posted on 07/01/2009 1:55:18 PM PDT by arthurus ("If you don't believe in shooting abortionists, don't shoot an abortionist." -Ann C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson