Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Limbaugh: Obama Laying Groundwork for Trird Term
Newsmax ^

Posted on 07/01/2009 12:22:10 PM PDT by peace with honor

Rush Limbaugh is suggesting that President Barack Obama and his political opertives are laying the groundwork for a third term." You have to wonder if obama is trying to lay a foundation for not being a hypocrite when he tries to serve beyond 2016" "Limbaugh told his national radio audience " I wouldn't be suprised at all if in the next number of years there is a move on the 22nd Amendment"

(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 22ndamendment; bho44; bhothirdterm; rush; trird
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: Travis T. OJustice

He must have meant “turd”.


21 posted on 07/01/2009 12:35:51 PM PDT by DadOfFive (...wake me when it's over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: fortunate sun
although the amendment wouldn’t apply to the current President,

Are you referring to an amendment to repeal the 22nd Amendment?

Why wouldn't it apply to the current President?

The current proposal to repeal the 22nd (HJR 5, by Jose Serrano, if I recall correctly) makes no such distinction.

22 posted on 07/01/2009 12:35:57 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: peace with honor

I predict a coordinated attack on the 22nd Amendment and the Electoral College.


23 posted on 07/01/2009 12:38:27 PM PDT by clintonh8r (General James Mattoon Scott: Where are you now that we need you?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: peace with honor

www.end22.com


24 posted on 07/01/2009 12:38:46 PM PDT by Califreak (Dissident under duress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DadOfFive

ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!! TO FUNNY,


25 posted on 07/01/2009 12:39:03 PM PDT by peace with honor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Travis T. OJustice

MAYBE I MEANT TURD


26 posted on 07/01/2009 12:39:59 PM PDT by peace with honor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: peace with honor

In talking about a third term, Rush is conceding a second term. A defeatist attitude is not something I’m used to hearing from him.


27 posted on 07/01/2009 12:40:44 PM PDT by balch3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: peace with honor
Here is a monument to the Annointed One here in Memphis.
28 posted on 07/01/2009 12:40:44 PM PDT by Sybeck1 (No teleprompters were harmed in the creation of this post.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fortunate sun
That is my understanding also. In order to eliminate the 22nd amendment, a new amendment would be needed repealing the 22nd. The occupant of the WH would not be effected by the changed (new) amendment. Truman would have been eligible to run for as many terms as he pleased. Eisenhower would have been the first President limited to two terms by virtue of being the first President elected under the new amendment.

Now that's not to say 0 wouldn't try, just as his pal in Honduras is trying to circumvent their constitution. Hopefully, if 0 tried something like this, the people, the congress and in the last hope-our military, would handle the situation the same way the Hondurans have.

29 posted on 07/01/2009 12:41:47 PM PDT by skimbell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cyclone59

“I predicted this before he was sworn in this past January. With all the moves he has made, I am stronger in my statement.”

That’s why he keeps likening himself to FDR.


30 posted on 07/01/2009 12:41:47 PM PDT by LottieDah (If only those who speak so eloquently on the rights of animals would do so on behalf the unborn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: peace with honor

you can always count on atleast 1 typo


31 posted on 07/01/2009 12:41:53 PM PDT by peace with honor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: peace with honor

I don’t believe we’ll have to worry about a 3rd term as I truly don’t believe this idiot will be reelected to a 2nd term!


32 posted on 07/01/2009 12:42:06 PM PDT by BamaDi ("John Kerry, why the long face?": Gov Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: peace with honor

Barry needs to get through his 1st term before worrying about any other terms......


33 posted on 07/01/2009 12:42:33 PM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: keep your powder dry

obama has been violating our Constitution on a daily if not hourly basis and not a peep of protest have I heard. Either from the Republican Party or the media.

While I won’t say that obama does not have worries, being called on violating the Constitution is not one of them.

If his owners want him to remain in the WhiteHouse after 2016 there will be no problem there.


34 posted on 07/01/2009 12:44:02 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: peace with honor

Third term? How about.........the end of free elections..period.


35 posted on 07/01/2009 12:44:10 PM PDT by Outlaw Woman (Lock ,Load..... Point & Click)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: peace with honor

Scary, Terrifying and Absolutely True and On Target!!
Thats Why OBOZO is so Freaked Out Over Honduras Dumping Their Dictator For Life Wantabe!


36 posted on 07/01/2009 12:44:52 PM PDT by True Republican Patriot (GOD BLESS AMERICA and Our Last Great President George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis T. OJustice
What is a trird?

A stinking turd that curls extremely to the left that was born on Jan. 20, 2009 yet has no birth certificate!

37 posted on 07/01/2009 12:45:39 PM PDT by meandog (Doh!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: skimbell
The 22nd amendment contains this clause:
But this article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President when this article was proposed by the Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term within which this article becomes operative from holding the office of President or acting as President during the remainder of such term.
There is no reason to expect that any amendment repealing the 22nd would have the same clause.
38 posted on 07/01/2009 12:49:20 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: BamaDi

With any luck, we’ll find out all the hidden details on this fraud before the end of this term.


39 posted on 07/01/2009 12:50:26 PM PDT by surrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: BamaDi

Elections mean what to barry? Nothing.


40 posted on 07/01/2009 12:51:02 PM PDT by svcw (Barry: mentally deficient & narcissistic misogynist megalomaniac psychopath w/ paranoid delusions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson