Posted on 07/01/2009 12:22:10 PM PDT by peace with honor
He must have meant “turd”.
Are you referring to an amendment to repeal the 22nd Amendment?
Why wouldn't it apply to the current President?
The current proposal to repeal the 22nd (HJR 5, by Jose Serrano, if I recall correctly) makes no such distinction.
I predict a coordinated attack on the 22nd Amendment and the Electoral College.
www.end22.com
ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!! TO FUNNY,
MAYBE I MEANT TURD
In talking about a third term, Rush is conceding a second term. A defeatist attitude is not something I’m used to hearing from him.
Now that's not to say 0 wouldn't try, just as his pal in Honduras is trying to circumvent their constitution. Hopefully, if 0 tried something like this, the people, the congress and in the last hope-our military, would handle the situation the same way the Hondurans have.
“I predicted this before he was sworn in this past January. With all the moves he has made, I am stronger in my statement.”
That’s why he keeps likening himself to FDR.
you can always count on atleast 1 typo
I don’t believe we’ll have to worry about a 3rd term as I truly don’t believe this idiot will be reelected to a 2nd term!
Barry needs to get through his 1st term before worrying about any other terms......
obama has been violating our Constitution on a daily if not hourly basis and not a peep of protest have I heard. Either from the Republican Party or the media.
While I won’t say that obama does not have worries, being called on violating the Constitution is not one of them.
If his owners want him to remain in the WhiteHouse after 2016 there will be no problem there.
Third term? How about.........the end of free elections..period.
Scary, Terrifying and Absolutely True and On Target!!
Thats Why OBOZO is so Freaked Out Over Honduras Dumping Their Dictator For Life Wantabe!
A stinking turd that curls extremely to the left that was born on Jan. 20, 2009 yet has no birth certificate!
But this article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President when this article was proposed by the Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term within which this article becomes operative from holding the office of President or acting as President during the remainder of such term.There is no reason to expect that any amendment repealing the 22nd would have the same clause.
With any luck, we’ll find out all the hidden details on this fraud before the end of this term.
Elections mean what to barry? Nothing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.