For some reason that doesn't seem to matter (see our good "friend" Blackacre's posts).
Blackacre simply refers to his personal preference to determine what is superior or inferior morality. But then this begs the question --- what makes him the ultimate moral authority ?
Why isn't Nancy Pelosi's personal preference superior to Blackacre's?
Um, why are you asking me instead of him? Though I think his answer would be that his personal preference is more socially utilitarian than hers.
I know . . . who decides that? He does, apparently.