Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Serious Questions About Sotomayor and Race
Fox News ^ | Monday, June 29, 2009 | John R. Lott, Jr.

Posted on 07/01/2009 8:35:30 AM PDT by richardb72

With the Supreme Court narrowly striking down Judge Sonia Sotomayor's decision in the New Haven fire fighter's case, it emphasizes the importance of a single vote and there are renewed questions about her judgment on race. It brings back into focus not only her comments on the superiority of certain racial groups and women, but when combined with her recent comments on the Belizean Grove club indicate a very selective and self serving decisions on deciding when discrimination is occurring.

Judge Sonia Sotomayor can't take back her seven speeches over a decade where she talked about women's (or Latina women's) judgment being superior to men' (or white men's). But, about a week ago, almost a month after her Supreme Court nomination, Judge Sotomayor resigned as a member of the extremely exclusive all-woman club, the Belizean Grove. If she were a Republican man, such a withdrawal would have come too late. Worse, her letter announcing her withdrawal from the organization raises questions about her judgment.

In June 1990, all but one of the Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee and one then Republican, Arlen Specter, warned future judicial nominees that membership in an organization that determines membership based on gender could be sufficient to deny confirmation. Further, it would be held against the nominee unless they "actively engaged" in efforts to get underrepresented groups into the organization.

Did Sotomayor try to get men admitted to the club? She doesn't mention it. Instead, she has taken a far more evasive tack. "I believe the Belizean Grove does not practice invidious discrimination and my membership did not violate the Judicial Code of Ethics, but I do not want questions about this to distract anyone from my qualifications and record," Judge Sotomayor wrote in a letter . . .

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: johnlott; obama; sotomayor; supremecourt

1 posted on 07/01/2009 8:35:31 AM PDT by richardb72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: richardb72
..."there are renewed questions about her judgment on race'''"

Judgment is not the issue.

2 posted on 07/01/2009 8:38:31 AM PDT by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: richardb72
"indicate a very selective and self serving decisions on deciding when discrimination is occurring. "

So what's the problem?

That's what being a Liberal is all about these days.

3 posted on 07/01/2009 8:40:39 AM PDT by TheClintons-STILLAnti-American (E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: richardb72

“Serious Questions About Sotomayor and Race”

...I don’t see any questions at all....it’s real simple...Sotomayor understands racial loyalty...whites can’t show racial loyalty or they will be called white supremecists.


4 posted on 07/01/2009 8:43:29 AM PDT by STONEWALLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: richardb72
The only thing any rational person/senator needs a to know to assure them NOT supporting her is that she is a long-time member of the hispanic equivalent of the ku klux klan, la raza.

What that means in the real world is, her confirmation is a slam-dunk.

5 posted on 07/01/2009 8:55:27 AM PDT by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson