It doesn’t matter what race the little boy is. The fact is he was victimized by a dirty, nasty pervert who should be strung up by his d**k till he’s dead.
Not to me. Or most posters.
But it seemed to matter to Frank Lombard.
While having conversations through the internet, he said he adopted black boys because getting approval from the adoption agency was so much easier. With what we know now, that he planned to use them for sex, doesn't that make Lombard a dirty, nasty racist pervert?
If any male wants to adopt a young child, great caution should be used.
No it doesn’t in that respect but it does matter when african american kids are being targeted for adoption by homosexuals because it is “easier”. Also the commune itself itemized the number of “people of color (all children)” at 11%. The leftist community made it about race. Frank Lombard made it about race. I don’t believe gay men should ever adopt children period but let us take this opportunity to have this debate or is the media’s stand on homosexuality one of speak no evil, hear not evil, and see no evil? It is a danger to allow any group to go without question. Even African American males aren’t afforded the kind of indifference to there race that homosexuals who pride themselves on telling everyone that that are proud to be gay are afforded when they are catch in such situations.
It is a disgrace. No one should be above question and no group should be protected from public scrutiny.
While I agree with your conclusion, the fact that he targeted black children by race because he could more easily obtain them for the purpose of harming them just digs another pit of utter reprehensible disgrace -- racial contempt -- to his crimes against humanity here, if it is even possible to plumb the depth of this sickening perversion of fatherhood and justice.
And second, this is yet another indictment of the hypocritical media, who would jump all over the race issue if the perv were a white straight man and the child were a black female; or worse, if the perv were any kind of a priest or pastor. The media cherry-picks which crimes against children will be publicized according to how desperately they want to promote the fairy tales about some favored group -- they are willing to let a little child be sodomized and harmed for life rather than publicize a sinful disgrace by a gay man.
It's just wrong for the media, who are supposed to be objective reporters, to twist the truth to try to defend wishful thinking about an unproven social experiment like gay adoption. Thirty years is the standard for observing and evaluating changes in the area of social science; instead of facts and research, we have been bombarded with an endless bandwagon of enthusiastic "human interest" promotion about ideal gay "families." This poor child was a victim of the shoddy journalism establishment as much as of the looney universities and this Duke employee pervert who worse than took him for a slave.