[humblegunner]

because we can measure what we hear on radio or tv against absolute principles.

Exactly.

And because of that ability we need not accept every utterance of Limbaugh as the truth
simply because it came out of his mouth. We may reach the exact same conclusions
but they should be attributed to knowledge and research, not a radio voice.

[reasonisfaith]

“we need not accept every utterance of Limbaugh as the truth”

Good point. Problem is nobody really does that.

Anyway—Rush provides a percentage rate for his truth-telling, placing it in the upper 90’s. You are obligated to refute this, and you must give concrete support for your argument.

But your agenda goes far beyond giving sound advice about knowledge or truth. You clearly have something personal against Rush.

So your comments have zero credibility.