Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OneWingedShark
IOW, the act itself is only neutral. Things like abandoning responsibilities, as is implied but unproven, are not.

I agree with the act being ostensibly neutral. More than one neighbor has conjured up implications. I simply don't understand a father placing himself in such a position; even through naivety.

14 posted on 06/30/2009 9:54:33 AM PDT by bcsco (I'm a Constitution defender!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: bcsco

fathers aren’t allowed to travel with their daughters?
Since when?


50 posted on 06/30/2009 1:46:09 PM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson