Posted on 06/29/2009 8:17:52 PM PDT by StilettoRaksha
Speaking of the situation in Iran, U.S. President Barack Obama said June 26, We dont yet know how any potential dialogue will have been affected until we see what has happened inside of Iran. On the surface that is a strange statement, since we know that with minor exceptions, the demonstrations in Tehran lost steam after Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei called for them to end and security forces asserted themselves. By the conventional wisdom, events in Iran represent an oppressive regime crushing a popular rising. If so, it is odd that the U.S. president would raise the question of what has happened in Iran.
In reality, Obamas point is well taken. This is because the real struggle in Iran has not yet been settled, nor was it ever about the liberalization of the regime. Rather, it has been about the role of the clergy particularly the old-guard clergy in Iranian life, and the future of particular personalities among this clergy.
(Excerpt) Read more at stratfor.com ...
If this is true, why wasn’t our articulate president able to articulate it?
Is Stratfor ever right ?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.