Skip to comments.
Waxman-Markey Is Our Smoot-Hawley
IBD Editorials ^
| June 29, 2009
| TOM MCCLINTOCK
Posted on 06/29/2009 6:24:36 PM PDT by Kaslin
Following is the floor speech that Republican Rep. Tom McClintock of California's fourth congressional district gave last Friday in opposition to the cap and trade legislation that passed that day.
I had a strange sense of deja vu as I watched the self-congratulatory rhetoric on the House floor tonight, and I feel compelled to offer this warning from the Left Coast.
Three years ago, I stood on the floor of the California Senate and watched a similar celebration over a similar bill, Assembly Bill 32. And I have spent the last three years watching as that law has dangerously deepened California's recession. It uses a different mechanism than cap and trade, but the objective is the same: to force a dramatic reduction in carbon dioxide emissions.
Until that bill took effect, California's unemployment numbers tracked very closely with the national unemployment rate. But then, in January of 2007, California's unemployment rate began a steady upward divergence from the national jobless figures. Today, California's unemployment rate is more than two points above the national rate, and at its highest point since 1941.
What is it that happened in January 2007? AB 32 took effect and began shutting down entire segments of California's economy. Let me give you one example from my district.
The city of Truckee, Calif., was about to sign a long-term power contract to get its electricity from a new, EPA-approved coal-fired electricity plant in Utah. AB 32 and companion legislation caused them to abandon that contract. The replacement power they acquired literally doubled their electricity costs.
(Excerpt) Read more at ibdeditorials.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: 111th; bho44; mcclintock; waxmanmarkey
1
posted on
06/29/2009 6:24:36 PM PDT
by
Kaslin
IBD Editorials
Please freep mail me if you want to be on my IBD Editorials ping list
2
posted on
06/29/2009 6:25:15 PM PDT
by
Kaslin
(Acronym for 0bama: One Bad Ass Mistake America)
To: blaveda; FrdmLvr; JDoutrider; KoRn; stockpixx; Stars&StripesNE; Tarheel
Ping
3
posted on
06/29/2009 6:26:03 PM PDT
by
Kaslin
(Acronym for 0bama: One Bad Ass Mistake America)
To: Kaslin
Tom McClintock gets it. He is probably the closest thing to Reagan in CA anymore.
4
posted on
06/29/2009 6:29:42 PM PDT
by
Frantzie
(Boycott ABC News and their parent company The Walt Disney Company)
To: Kaslin
McClintock - the only politician from California that is worth anything. He was the only one who talked sense when he ran in the Gray Davis recall election, and he continues to talk sense.
Good analysis of this latest fiasco from the Pelosi Congress.
5
posted on
06/29/2009 6:35:27 PM PDT
by
El Cid
(Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house...)
To: Kaslin; All
If California had elected Tom McClintock in 2003 instead of the buffoon Schwarzenegger we would be in so much better shape. He would have begun addressing the systemic problems with California's budget immediately and while revenues were decent. He said at the time we were having a difficult time balancing the budget with record revenues what will we do if (and when) we have a recession.
But hey the enlightened voters of state got a movie star for governor. That's what's important, isn't it?
Well a catastrophe has ensued and the voters of the state are responsible for the mess. I don't see any evidence that the average person knows what's going on. I guess they are too interested in watching American Idol or the Michael Jackson Non-stop publicity machine.
Well a day of reckoning will arrive July 1. The people will know then. Will they then do the right thing? I doubt it, they are too stupid.
6
posted on
06/29/2009 6:36:38 PM PDT
by
truthguy
(Good intentions are not enough!)
To: Kaslin
It should be called the Waxman-Madoff bill.
To: truthguy
But hey the enlightened voters of state got a movie star for governor. That's what's important, isn't it? Many FReepers from many states bad-mouthed Tom here on FR because he wasn't 'photogenic' enough.
Guess which one the GOP backed?
Why back a party that helps elect liberal movie-stars instead of fiscal conservatives?
8
posted on
06/29/2009 8:10:50 PM PDT
by
Ol' Dan Tucker
(People should not be afraid of the government. Governement should be afraid of the people)
To: Proud_USA_Republican
Why leave Markey out of it?
9
posted on
06/29/2009 8:53:53 PM PDT
by
Kaslin
(Acronym for 0bama: One Bad Ass Mistake America)
To: Kaslin
Waxman-Malarkey-Madoff Bill. That sounds perfect.
To: Proud_USA_Republican; 1rudeboy; Toddsterpatriot; Mase
FReepers from many states bad-mouthed Tom here on FR because he wasn't 'photogenic' Make that some freepers. Imho it's only the noisy minority that love tariffs and hate Republicans.
To: calcowgirl
12
posted on
07/02/2009 11:59:58 AM PDT
by
rabscuttle385
("If this be treason, then make the most of it!" —Patrick Henry)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson