Skip to comments.
Future perfect
Can a clothing-optional policy teach her young girls to be comfortable as women?
The Boston Globe ^
| June 29, 2009
| Jennifer Mattern
Posted on 06/29/2009 2:59:42 PM PDT by buccaneer81
Future perfect Can a clothing-optional policy teach her young girls to be comfortable as women? By Jennifer Mattern June 28, 2009
I aint what I used to be.
But my daughters dont know that. They cant imagine me any other way -- this soft, paunchy creature they have come to refer to as Mom. I tell them to take a good look, that someday they are likely to look much like I do now. They laugh. Preposterous!
I grew up in a household where everyones jiggly bits were kept under wraps. Only once, when I was very young, do I remember taking a shower with my mother. I recall being shocked at the fullness of her breasts, the curves of her belly and thighs.
(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: moonbat; nudism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
To: buccaneer81
If she has such a strong desire to show her body, she can show it to me.
Nudity in this Owl’s house has a three word policy: “Hide Your Shame”
21
posted on
06/29/2009 3:29:34 PM PDT
by
End Times Sentinel
(In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
To: Bushwacker777
Don't try to inject common sense around here.
L
22
posted on
06/29/2009 3:31:26 PM PDT
by
Lurker
(The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
To: buccaneer81
I was raised in a very conservative modest environment. Modesty was mandatory. I did not get pregnant, nor did I have “carnal” knowledge before marriage. Why? I knew my Dad would kill me.
23
posted on
06/29/2009 3:32:20 PM PDT
by
WVNan
( (Attack him where he is unprepared, appear where you are not expected.: Sun Tzu))
To: buccaneer81
I don’t know about that. How big is her butt?
24
posted on
06/29/2009 3:34:20 PM PDT
by
Radl
(sai)
To: buccaneer81
she is Guilty..........
of BEING HOT!
To: buccaneer81
You're right! This Jennifer Mattern is
NOT GUILTY. She also is not the Jennifer Mattern of the Boston Globe who wrote this piece.
Here's the Jennifer Mattern who wrote the article:
26
posted on
06/29/2009 3:35:20 PM PDT
by
skimbell
To: skimbell
27
posted on
06/29/2009 3:36:14 PM PDT
by
buccaneer81
(Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
To: AppyPappy
To: flash2368
Does this explain your screen name?
29
posted on
06/29/2009 3:44:36 PM PDT
by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, then writes again.)
To: buccaneer81
oh pleeeease have this woman put her clothes back on
30
posted on
06/29/2009 3:45:45 PM PDT
by
MissDairyGoodnessVT
(Mac Conchradha - "Skeagh mac en chroe"- Skaghvicencrowe)
To: buccaneer81
oh pleeeease have this woman put her clothes back on - what she NEEDS to do is explain WHY human beings wear clothing especially in the bibilical sense.
31
posted on
06/29/2009 3:51:29 PM PDT
by
MissDairyGoodnessVT
(Mac Conchradha - "Skeagh mac en chroe"- Skaghvicencrowe)
To: AppyPappy
My son made his own time to make sure I didn’t see him while he was changing. Around 7, I think. Probably the time they change from Mom, to Dad, in most things.
32
posted on
06/29/2009 3:52:30 PM PDT
by
huldah1776
( Worthy is the Lamb)
To: Jeff Chandler
...jiggly bits?I don't know anything about the author, but that turn of phrase sounds British.
33
posted on
06/29/2009 3:53:28 PM PDT
by
Petronski
(In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
To: buccaneer81
There will come a time when everybody
Who is lonely will be free
To sing & dance & love
There will come a time when every evil
That we know will be an evil
That we can rise above
Who cares if hair is long or short
or sprayed or partly grayed
We know that hair ain’t where it’s at
There will come a time when you won’t
even be ashamed if you are fat!
WAH WAH-WAH WAH
There will come a time when everybody
Who is lonely will be free
To sing & dance & love (dance and love)
There will come a time when every evil
that we know will be an evil
That we can rise above (rise above)
Who cares if you’re so poor you can’t afford
To buy a pair of Mod-a-Go-Go stretch elastic pants
THERE WILL COME A TIME WHEN YOU CAN EVEN
TAKE YOUR CLOTHES OFF WHEN YOU DANCE
34
posted on
06/29/2009 3:54:44 PM PDT
by
oblomov
(Every election is a sort of advance auction sale of stolen goods. - Mencken)
To: buccaneer81
I see that the liberals, libertarians, and progressives are outing themselves on this thread.
To: buccaneer81
So wheres the perfect Can?
36
posted on
06/29/2009 4:08:17 PM PDT
by
right way right
(Do not mistake Religion for God.)
To: Old Professer
“Does this explain your screen name?”
No.. I was tortured as “Flash Gordon” during my childhood..:o)
37
posted on
06/29/2009 4:17:10 PM PDT
by
flash2368
(Scary Times)
To: buccaneer81
Is this what women consider to be one of the pressing issues of the day?
To: flash2368
I hate to be the bearer of bad news for the modest among us, however children raised in clothing optional or nudist environments have fewer hangups and a more positive body image. More importantly however the mystery is removed about the body and the teenage pregnancy rate is practically zip among girls raised in such environments.
I'm going to have to call BS on this, because I remember what it was like to be a teenager, and the urge to have sex had nothing to do with the "mystery" of the body. Hormones don't give a damn if a girl's body is a mystery to you or if you can name every part in alphabetical order. If there is any correlation between nudists and low teenage pregnancy rate, it has nothing to do with the actual casual nudity. For example, did it ever occur to you that the kind of people who would drag their kids to nudist events, or practice open nudity at home for all ages might also be the same kind of people who hand out birth control to their kids like candy? Or who would take their girls to the abortion clinic without hesitation (and never report the pregnancy)?
39
posted on
06/29/2009 4:41:58 PM PDT
by
fr_freak
To: Jeff Chandler
Well, it’s certainly true that up through at least the early 1960s, “respectable” women were routinely packed up like sausages in heavy-duty bras and girdles (some of which came up to the bottom of the bra and went down to the tops of the knees) that made sure that no matter how fat and flabby the real woman underneath, NOTHING “jiggled”. That was pretty insane, but I think the writer of this article has pretty much gone insane on the other end of the spectrum.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson