That is a thoughtful response.
But once the decisions are being made in Austin or Dallas or Houston, Texans may find themselves friendlier to the Nanny state.
That's how things have been in history: colonists throw out the mother country and end up with a government even more powerful than a foreign king could ever be.
The objection deep down may not be to government as such but to not being more fully self-governed.
You see this kind of thing in politics a lot.
The GOP didn't object to deficits and increasing debt when Republicans ran Congress and the White House.
Obama gets away with positions that Democrats would scream about in a Republican -- locking up suspected terrorists, wars overseas, opposition to gay marriage.
And Texans are a lot more opposed to big government when someone else is running it than when it's home grown.
You are absolutely incorrect...we had big issues with Bush one and two....and we made these issues publicly clear from debt to immigration issues....