Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WorkingClassFilth
I’m guessing Paul would’ve thought dimmly of his remains becoming iconic.

Didn't St. Paul say that he saw dimly through a glass? If so, I suppose that means that he thought dimly as well.

I don't know what he would have thought about his remains becoming relics. Relics and icons are both objects of veneration. But is a relic iconic? I have always thought of relics and icons as being quite different objects. But perhaps you have a point. How do you conceive a relic as being iconic?

13 posted on 06/28/2009 10:07:22 PM PDT by stripes1776 ("That if gold rust, what shall iron do?" --Chaucer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: stripes1776

Maybe I was being imprecise, but I thought icons were objects of veneration and, sure as shooting, that is what his remains (if they are that) will become. Seems to me that nearly all relics become icons - at least in the minds of people I’ve seen around the world worshipping them. I think Paul would’ve favored mouldering away.


14 posted on 06/28/2009 10:13:25 PM PDT by WorkingClassFilth (Sarah Palin is our next President - start supporting her NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: stripes1776

“I don’t know what he would have thought about his remains becoming relics.”

I do. Paul was a Christian.


35 posted on 06/29/2009 6:46:22 AM PDT by RoadTest (I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me. - John 14:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson