Constitution? Since when did a Democrat care anything about the Constitution?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
To: Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; Allerious; ...
37 posted on
06/28/2009 10:26:34 AM PDT by
bamahead
(Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
To: Mobile Vulgus
Constitution? Since when did a Democrat care anything about the Constitution?
___________
Democrats don’t OWN this country and there are more people that DO care about the Constitution than don’t and they may find that our the hard way in the end.
40 posted on
06/28/2009 10:43:46 AM PDT by
mojitojoe
(All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent.)
To: Mobile Vulgus
This is the way it should be. All of the problems we’re having in this country is because the federal government is out of control. We need to return to federalism. States should just tell the feds to pound sand and exercise their 10th amendment rights to SCOTUS. Otherwise, why even have states then? Might as well just have one contiguous nation.
41 posted on
06/28/2009 10:52:44 AM PDT by
Extremely Extreme Extremist
("President Obama, your agenda is not new, it's not change, and it's not hope" - Rush Limbaugh 02/28)
To: Mobile Vulgus
They should “opt out” of a lot more than just communist-care. I’d love to see 6 or 16 or 26 states “opt out” of the forced withholding federal income tax from their constituents’ pay checks.
45 posted on
06/28/2009 11:20:50 AM PDT by
meyer
( "The world is a beautiful place and worth fighting for. But not without Freedom.")
To: Mobile Vulgus
If other states don’t add to this list I will move to the one that has this.
To: Mobile Vulgus
If state opt out laws were possible, there would be no “need” for or possibility of ObamaCare. Instead of having to opt out of national (how would that work financially and legally, anyway?), the states that want ObamaCare or HillaryCare or RomneyCare would just implement it on the state level.
Of course, they know and understand that it would shift costs to their state and shift income to other states as business and people relocate, so some states definitely want a nationally imposed mandate.
This cost and income shift (which states will pay and which will benefit) is the best way for Republicans in Congress and on the state level to explain to people of most states, and to fight the one-size-fits-all no-choice / anti-choice nationalization of industries and services.
49 posted on
06/28/2009 12:32:07 PM PDT by
CutePuppy
(If you don't ask the right questions you may not get the right answers)
To: Mobile Vulgus
“federal fiat”
Is that the new name of Chrysler, after bankruptcy?
50 posted on
06/28/2009 12:41:33 PM PDT by
UCANSEE2
(The Last Boy Scout)
To: Mobile Vulgus
I'd be happier if there were 6 states nullifying Obama’s election due to not meeting constitutional requirements.
51 posted on
06/28/2009 1:16:25 PM PDT by
varon
(Allegiance to the constitution, always. Allegiance to a political party, never.)
To: Mobile Vulgus
Minnesota? It’s one of the most liberal states in the country! Minnesotans LOVE socialism, it is like manna to them. Thus, I am very surprised Minnesota is even considering an opt-out clause.
53 posted on
06/28/2009 5:28:44 PM PDT by
ought-six
( Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
To: Mobile Vulgus
...and how do you opt out of a federal madate?
59 posted on
06/29/2009 10:05:43 AM PDT by
americanophile
(Sarcasm: satirical wit depending for its effect on bitter, caustic, and often ironic language.)
To: Mobile Vulgus
...how do you opt out of a federal mandate?
60 posted on
06/29/2009 10:07:05 AM PDT by
americanophile
(Sarcasm: satirical wit depending for its effect on bitter, caustic, and often ironic language.)
To: nutmeg
61 posted on
07/02/2009 10:19:05 AM PDT by
nutmeg
(Sarah and Todd Palin and the Deadliest Catch captains should run this country)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-32 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson