Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Erik Latranyi
Found this on another forum. It is the pilot's report of the event:

"Tuesday 23rd June, 2009 10am enroute HKG to NRT. Entering Narita Japan airspace.

"FL390 mostly clear with occasional isolated areas of rain, clouds tops about FL410. "Outside air temperature was -50C TAT -21C (you're not supposed to get liquid water at these temps). We did.

"As we were following other aircraft along our route. We approached a large area of rain below us. Tilting the weather radar down we could see the heavy rain below, displayed in red. At our altitude the radar indicated green or light precipitation, most likely ice crystals we thought.

"Entering the cloud tops we experienced just light to moderate turbulence. (The winds were around 30kts at altitude.) After about 15 seconds we encountered moderate rain. We thought it odd to have rain streaming up the windshield at this altitude and the sound of the plane getting pelted like an aluminum garage door. It got very warm and humid in the cockpit all of a sudden. Five seconds later the Captain's, First Officer's, and standby airspeed indicators rolled back to 60kts. The auto pilot and auto throttles disengaged. The Master Warning and Master Caution flashed, and the sounds of chirps and clicks letting us know these things were happening.

"Jerry Staab, the Capt. hand flew the plane on the shortest vector out of the rain. The airspeed indicators briefly came back but failed again. The failure lasted for THREE minutes. We flew the recommended 83%N1 power setting. When the airspeed indicators came back we were within 5 knots of our desired speed. Everything returned to normal except for the computer logic controlling the plane. (We were in alternate law for the rest of the flight.)

"We had good conditions for the failure; daylight, we were rested, relatively small area, and light turbulence. I think it could have been much worse. Jerry did a great job flying and staying cool. We did our procedures called dispatch and maintenance on the SAT COM and landed in Narita. That's it."

Warm rain at FL390. I bet there was a hailstorm down on the ocean below.

35 posted on 06/27/2009 6:21:15 AM PDT by magellan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: magellan
"We had good conditions for the failure; daylight, we were rested, relatively small area, and light turbulence. I think it could have been much worse. Jerry did a great job flying and staying cool. We did our procedures called dispatch and maintenance on the SAT COM and landed in Narita. That's it."

In all of Airbus' history, aircraft have landing in direct law only a dozen times, and in alternate law only a dozen times a year. It does happen, which is why there are three design redundancies in flight laws. This event resulted in a single redudancy being lost, and a remaining direct law redundancy. The airline I fly for, we train for EXACTLY this scenario, and the results when they happen (you don't read about it because it is not newsworthy), our crews follow procedure and we have similar results. Crew training is what makes all the difference.
41 posted on 06/27/2009 6:33:04 AM PDT by safisoft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson