[wita]

those who are supported by the United States and Israel

Uhhh that would be whom? And how is that done, when there are no relations?

Then there is this: “The protests have also led to a war of words between Iran and the US, which has criticised the conduct of the June 12 election”.

Don’t think so Tim. What was criticized was the treatment of Iranian citizens after the election.

Then there was this: “This is our friendly advice; we don’t want to see the big disgraces of the Bush era to be repeated in the new US era”. Those would be what? Freedom in Iraq, Spanking the Taliban and Al Qaeda world wide. Keeping Iran in the box. What?

Then there was this: The latest comments by both presidents could complicate any attempt at a dialogue, which Washington hopes will include talks on the scope of Iran’s nuclear programme. I don’t think Washington is at all concerned with the scope of Iran’s nuclear program. More like Iran’s nuclear aspirations, considering its radical Islamic view of Israel, and the USA.

[Munz]

>>Then there was this: “This is our friendly advice; we don’t want to see the big disgraces of the Bush era to be repeated in the new US era”. Those would be what? Freedom in Iraq, Spanking the Taliban and Al Qaeda world wide. Keeping Iran in the box. What?<<

Notice that since Bush left and a new kinder more understanding open to dialog type has taken over that everything has turned to crap fast, quick and in a hurry?
Think North Korea would have pulled what they are if Bush was there?
I don’t think so.

Imagine North Korea threatening a nuclear launch on America and Bush just taking a “wait and see” attitude like Obama?
We would be over there right now stomping the guts out of them.