Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama administration sides with Saudis, seeks to deny 9/11 families their day in court
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2009/06/023904.php ^

Posted on 06/26/2009 11:43:35 PM PDT by newbie2008

It's no secret that members of the Saudi royal family have provided extensive financial support to al Qaeda. But now, as Eric Lichtblau of the New York Times reports, thousands of pages of previously undisclosed documents provide a detailed look at this disgusting phenomenon.

The documents have been compiled by lawyers for the Sept. 11 families and their insurers who are suing the Saudi government and the individual Saudi princes who personally gave money to Muslim charities they knew would be funding al-Qaeda's jihad against America. Some of the documents are classified American intelligence material that was leaked anonymously to lawyers for the families. Others were obtained under the Freedom of Information Act. For example, Treasury Department documents show that a prominent Saudi charity, the International Islamic Relief Organization, heavily supported by members of the Saudi royal family, supported terrorist organizations at least through 2006.

Unfortunately, this material may never find its way into court. That's because the Second Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that the victims of 9/11 and their families may not sue either the Saudi government or even the individual princes who gave money to terrorists in their private capacities.

(Excerpt) Read more at powerlineblog.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 06/26/2009 11:43:35 PM PDT by newbie2008
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: newbie2008

Saudi Royal Family was put on a plane and sent out of America on 9/11 according to President Bush. Are we friends of them? Why Obama being friendly with them is a bad thing but Bush being friendly with them was ok. What am I missing?


2 posted on 06/26/2009 11:46:52 PM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newbie2008

This would get tossed on soverign immunity grounds anyway, so why would a U.S. administration take the opposite view - and irritate a key Mideast ally? There’s no gain.


3 posted on 06/26/2009 11:47:46 PM PDT by americanophile (Sarcasm: satirical wit depending for its effect on bitter, caustic, and often ironic language.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Obama pandering to the Saudis? I await the Michael Moore expose’... There must be one coming, right?


4 posted on 06/26/2009 11:48:21 PM PDT by kittycatonline.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kittycatonline.com

Let’s hope. But please neither of us can hold our breath or we will be dead waiting.


5 posted on 06/26/2009 11:49:34 PM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: newbie2008

6 posted on 06/26/2009 11:53:33 PM PDT by Rodebrecht (What are you and who do you want?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newbie2008
Even if the victims sue and win a judgment in court they will never be allowed to collect any award of damages.

Look at what happened to the Iran hostages when they sought to have damages awarded after winning a judgment against Iran.

7 posted on 06/27/2009 2:35:13 AM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: count-your-change

first off,assets here would at some point be seized (if found guilty)which means they’d remove them or sell them off before a judge could freeze them.
I don’t know,but i suspect from past stories that other countries might oblige the freeze order which could put them in a difficult spot.
At any rate,there could be a significant dislocation in our markets were they to divest themselves of all things American. I’d guess too that it wouldn’t just be the ones sued but all Saudi investments.
I suspect the issue then is monetary and while i’d love to see them sued into a state of poverty,our own goverment will never allow that to happen.


8 posted on 06/27/2009 3:40:36 AM PDT by wiggen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wiggen

Can’t a judgement offer legal weight for an eventual settlement. In other words how is this different than Libya’s bombing of two flights (see below).

Almost twenty years after seven Americans were killed in the bombing of a French airplane, a federal judge in D.C. ordered Libya and six of its officials to pay about $6 billion in damages to their families. Here is Judge Henry Kennedy’s 104-page opinion, a Bloomberg story and a press release from Crowell & Moring, the lawyers for the families.

In 1989, UTA Flight 772 crashed in central Niger en route to Paris from Chad. All 170 passengers and crew were killed. (Click here for a statement of facts.) It came less than a year after the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Scotland which killed 270 people. Crowell & Moring, led by Stuart Newberger, sued Libya and six of its officials pursuant to the “terrorism exception” of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act — a law that strips terrorist states of their immunity from lawsuits.


9 posted on 06/27/2009 6:00:44 AM PDT by exhaustguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: newbie2008

The BOW was a sign of submission and a signal to the Muzlem world.

Where’s the Birth Certificate? Someone has got to move to get his usurper out of the White House and NEGATE everything he’s done to screw up our Sovereign Nation.


10 posted on 06/27/2009 7:24:25 AM PDT by HighlyOpinionated (Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann in 2012. With Liz Cheney as Secretary of State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wiggen
As I recall, the Iran gov. lost the suit against them by default and when the hostages and relatives tried to seize the Iranian gov. bank accounts, the Bush justice dept. said no, legal judgment or not.
11 posted on 06/27/2009 8:30:28 AM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: exhaustguy

i’m sure it could in theory work the same way but we were never a big trading partner of libya nor reliant upon them for oil.


12 posted on 06/28/2009 2:04:42 AM PDT by wiggen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson