Couple things here. 1. Like half of your argument is based on one thing that Sarah said. If you look far back almost everyone will have made some grammatical errors. 2. No matter what you say, McCain ran against Obama. I know several people in my personal life who were not going to vote for McCain till Sarah was added to the ticket. Some still refused. She added manymanymany votes, look at the polls from last year. 3. Palin can beat Obama, especially after four years of this crap that “The One” is gonna throw on us.
Oh and if you screen my comment to look for any sort of error in spelling or grammar so you can use ad-homonym attacks against me. Forget about it. There are too many of those going around.
And I know that one of my points is technically a logical fallacy. Just an example.
1) I’m not basing it on one thing Sarah said.
I just used that as an example, because it was her latest public statement.
I could use any number of unscripted things she’s said.
I could point to all of her interviews and her debate performance, too.
It’s all just more of the same.
Color me unimpressed with her mental acumen.
2) A deficit of 10 million votes shows that she can’t draw them in. If she was the juggernaut her fans claim she is, the election would have at least been a little bit close.
3) AB0 (Anybody But 0bama) is not a winning strategy. The Democrats learned that in 2004. Our side is going to have to offer the voters something with substance if we want to win. We are going to have to identify the problems, shape the debate, articulate a real path forward, and convince the voters we are right. It’s going to take more than a tightly scripted figurehead politician to succeed. We’re going to need a real leader for that. Maybe even someone like Jack Welch. But not an Alaskan fisherman.