Really?
Posted on 06/26/2009 12:30:16 AM PDT by neverdem
Yep, Sarah scares the hell out of them, and it is so much fun to watch them hissing and sputtering like an overheated cappucino machine. If anyone is to be compared to a life support system for a sexual organ, evie and her ilk are it.
I don’t really understand Debra Saunders angst she is usually a pretty good writer but women can be catty. I’m sure they think that because they believe themselves smarter than Palin they feel a bit of jealousy at her rise and the appearance that she has it all. All the things they were told they couldn’t have together in one package. Beauty, a large family, a manly husband, a political career, a down syndrome baby. Sarah Palin presents an uplifting story of hope and faith, she didn’t listen to anyone telling her what she could or couldn’t have she like most Americans just went out and got it and took responsibility for her life as well as those she brought into this world. What the left and even some in the GOP wish to sell is a set of false premises that rope us into a rigid faithless worldview of the planned and “perfect” world they would have for us. Sarah Palin’s shouldn’t exist without them. That she does exist makes them irrelevant and what else do individuals who many times have no progeny of their own being too narcissistic to even find a committed mate have if they are irrelevant? They have their rage like the spoiled children they really are they throw temper tantrums in the presence of angels.
Sarah has been glowingly compared with Ronald Reagan and John F. Kennedy and Franklin D. Roosevelt? Seriously? By sentient humans? I don’t see it. I see Sarah as another Obama, an Affirmative Action Selection, with followers and fans who confuse presentability with competence. I mean, if the young, photogenic, conservative governor of Alaska had been a man, would McCain’s VP selectors (or I) have ever even heard of him?
Scientologist. Sorry but anyone who can believe in that should never hold any public office.
Sarah Palin is a scientologist?
Uh, I don’t think so.
Who is a Scientologist?
Really?
May Ensler's nightmares worsen for the rest of the 21st Century.
By comparing her to this filthy, you dirty Palin.
Take a look at her record in Alaska in just a few years. She has accomplished a lot and she is getting better and better.
It would be interesting to see how much of her readership has dwindled since her anti-Palin broadsides. She probably picked up a few squishy moderates who hated Palin too, but I'll bet her currency at conservative gatherings has deterioted drastically. I used to read her occasionally, but refuse to read anything she writes now. I started feeling ill towards her in 2007 when she wrote that Hillary was "well qualifed to be president." I put her well down my list of "conservatives" to read after that remark of hers.
Shows how much you know. She has turned out to be an unusually effective and accomplished governor of her state. From the pipeline to the governmental reforms, she has got things done that eluded every man who came before her. She has cut spending something like 20%, while we are just piling it on under Obama and before him under Bush.
I really don't care if I can beat her at Trivial Pursuit. I want her as my President.
I really don't care if I can beat her at Trivial Pursuit. I want her as my President.
Perfectly stated.
I'm with you and her on the statement.
Also, you do realize that the Kennedy mystique was bought and bottled for you to lap up?
Jack Kennedy, just like Fat Ted, was a party-boy nincompoop who wouldn’t have made it into Harvard without big donations from old Joe, and wouldn’t have made it out of Harvard without the best tutors and ringers that money could hire. “Profiles in Courage” was ghost-written in its entirety by a Kennedy family flunky, and handed an undeserved Pulitzer thanks to more bribes from the old man.
If Sarah Palin had been born with the same advantages in life that Jack Kennedy had, she’d blow him out of the water. I think she may yet do so anyway.
Sarah Palin, who is refreshingly and wonderfully normal,True.
Sarah is who I’m voting for in 2012. You say: she might not be the GOP nominee in 2012. As I said Sarah is who I’m voting for in 2012!!! If there is a Mc-What-his-name on the ticket, it will be for VP.
“I really don’t care if I can beat her at Trivial Pursuit..etc..
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Well, let’s pursue this from a different angle...
We are trying ‘supposed intelligence’, lets try ‘stupid’ for awhile, how much worse can it get?????
Cheers!
Another Obama?
Goofy statement of the YEAR!!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.