Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: muawiyah

An ambiguous hint at worst. I could buy endangering, but not threatening.


12 posted on 06/25/2009 5:24:30 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (In only 19 weeks, 0 has enabled us to agree with the Taliban [his empty speechifying] - Iron Munro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: HiTech RedNeck
Usually no charges at all are made in these matters. Just about all the folks who publish these home addresses and phone numbers simply don't realize the legal protections federal judges need ~ and remember that even Obama has a friend who tried to murder a state Supreme Court judge and his entire family with a bomb.

The threat is ever present, but for the most part a little privacy is about all that's needed to keep most of the crazoids away.

Judges aren't the only folks with this problem ~ top level legal investigators, forensic laboratory specialists, various administrative law judges, and many other regulators with the power to write "final agency decision" put their lives on the line every day.

14 posted on 06/25/2009 5:28:54 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: HiTech RedNeck

...Ambiguous at best...

Tell it to the judge. If you get indicted on federal charges, and he has only been arrested at this point, the odds are about 90% you will be convicted or cop a plea.


26 posted on 06/25/2009 6:10:55 PM PDT by mono
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson