Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: patriotgal1787

Wasn’t it just a little bit presumptuous for a group believing in primacy of private property rights to schedule an event on private property without the owner’s permission?


32 posted on 06/25/2009 10:25:25 AM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. Lucky
"It is unfortunate the event had to be canceled," said Julianne Thompson, event co-organizer. She continued, "The old Macy's building is on private property, and not owned by Simon Malls, however the mall manager asked the property owner and I to come in the office on Thursday of this week [June 18], and told us Simon does not want political events on its property. They were also concerned about the fact we were using the term 'protest.' Although the event was on private property, the mall was able to assert authority on the matter due to reciprocal property easement agreements."

Event Co-Chair Debbie Dooley stated, "Our Atlanta Tea Party team tried for the next day and a half to find an alternative location large enough for the event, and with the proper layout for our vendors, children's activities, and fireworks show, but we could not find anything suitable that would have been available on July 4th.

35 posted on 06/25/2009 10:29:08 AM PDT by KansasGirl (I still think Obama is just plain creepy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Mr. Lucky

LOL! Yeah, I was thinking the same thing reading through all the comments suggesting someone’s private property be taken over without their permission.


82 posted on 06/25/2009 11:16:00 AM PDT by randog (Tap into America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson