Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Balding_Eagle
If there is no time limit, what good is the word of the state?

These privacy laws need to be changed.They should,at least,have a time limit (at 21 the child can be given contact info),if not done away with completely.

They may even be sued to provide financial support in the future.

I'd be completely opposed to that.However,if a biological mother/father volunteered to assist a child...

284 posted on 06/26/2009 6:56:53 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Christian+Veteran=Terrorist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies ]


To: Gay State Conservative
I'd be completely opposed to that.

So I go back to one of my original questions. Is your opposition and contract binding for 5 years, 5 months, 5 hours?

As you yourself said, no time limit, the contract can be overturned in a heartbeat. It's meaningless.

If this doublecross by the state stands, both natural parents of any child being place for adoption better start a college fund.

Without the rule of law we have the chaos this case illustrates.

285 posted on 06/26/2009 7:13:51 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle (Overproduction, one of the top five worries for the American farmer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson