[Cboldt]

-- Too bad, but we’re playing a bit of an ‘outrageous sense of entitlement’ game to expect someone completely opposed to a political event to allow his private property to be used. --

Technically, the way I read it, his property is NOT being used. He is objecting to a use on property where he has a shared easement right.

He's on strong footing, but he's also being a dink, and it's worth pointing out he is controlling a space that is not exclusively his to control. It's a quasi-public space.

the event was on private property [not Simon's], the mall was able to assert authority on the matter due to reciprocal property easement agreements.

[angkor]

>>>> Technically, the way I read it, his property is NOT being used. <<<<<

Whatever rights he has are sufficient to stop the event.