Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wireplay
I don't understand your argument.

Eating pickles tells us nothing about behavior.

On the other hand, about 90% of the inmates at SuperMax have used illegal drugs.

About 90% of the guards at SuperMax have not used illegal drugs.

To me, the conclusion is obvious.

If you disagree, I have no idea what else to say.

20 posted on 06/23/2009 12:31:39 AM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: zeestephen

Basic statistics. I’ll try and break it down for you.

r2 implies correlation. Hence, if I find a ‘positive’ r2 it implies a direct correlation. A ‘negative’ r2 implies an inverse correlation.

Prisoners consuming pickles and who are also sociopaths, if measured, will probably result in a ‘positive’ r2 or a ‘positive correlation’. A reason why eating pickles results in sociopathic behavior.

If we take society as a whole, a lot of the guards at SuperMax have used pot. They have also probably eaten pickles. Now, let’s view this and say that pot may not lead to sociopathic behavior and that eating pickles will NOT result in sociopathic behavior. Hmmmmmmmmmm, perhaps sociopathic behavior may not be caused by eating pickles or smoking pot.

Lots of stat tutorials on line. Simple stuff if you spend a small amount of time trying to understand studies and what an r2 means.

Lies, damn lies, and statistics.


28 posted on 06/23/2009 12:54:42 AM PDT by wireplay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson