Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kodak takes famous film out of picture (Kodachrome)
Financial times ^ | June 22 2009 19:00 | Last updated: June 22 2009 19:00 | Alan Rappeport i

Posted on 06/22/2009 2:34:46 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: Ramius
I burned through a fair amount myself.

Another type I used was Ilford B/W film and it was fun to develop myself.

21 posted on 06/22/2009 3:07:26 PM PDT by wally_bert (My doctor says that I have a malformed public-duty gland and a natural deficiency in moral fibre)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: llevrok

I’ve heard professional photogs say the same about the more recent films that are out as well.


22 posted on 06/22/2009 3:13:01 PM PDT by reed13 (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: JRios1968

Good point.


23 posted on 06/22/2009 3:31:26 PM PDT by Hodar (Who needs laws .... when this "feels" so right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: CanaGuy
And what is wrong with a 40 year old song? Some of us are over 50 you know. Song had a good sound, even if it didn't make a lot of sense.

Kodachrome, they give us those nice bright colours
They give us the greens of summers
Makes you think all the world's a sunny day, oh yeah
I got a Nikon camera, I love to take a photograph
So mama don't take my Kodachrome away

24 posted on 06/22/2009 3:47:35 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JRios1968

She was so beautiful. How sad that life has been so hard on her.


25 posted on 06/22/2009 3:49:04 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

It is a great song.


26 posted on 06/22/2009 3:50:11 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

I’venever liked Kodak products. I always use Fujifilm.


27 posted on 06/22/2009 3:52:09 PM PDT by squarebarb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hodar; JRios1968
It wasn't an ugly tree, it was hate, ignorance and intolerance. Most Westerns are incapable of understanding the toll 25 years of third world poverty and civil war take.
28 posted on 06/22/2009 3:54:21 PM PDT by Red Dog #1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
Kodachrome was a brilliantly designed film. It was sharp and colorful, very long lasting (archival) and did not fade provided it was stored properly.

Kodak erred in not allowing for the need for quick processing - the Kodachrome K14 process took at least 24 hours to have processed even on a rush basis, while the Ektachrome E-6 process could be done in an hour with a much simpler processor machine.

Supposedly someone came out with a one-hour K14 process but Kodak would not let it be marketed. One of many marketing failures from Eastman Kodak.

At least I still have a few hundred shots of Kodachrome taken when I was a teenager and into photography...

29 posted on 06/22/2009 3:54:45 PM PDT by ikka (Brother, you asked for it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Crazieman

Absurd. Kodachrome went out of patent long ago and anyone who wished could produce a duplicate. Apparently nobody wishes, or else there would be a lot more places to develop it.


30 posted on 06/22/2009 3:56:03 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (In only 19 weeks, 0 has enabled us to agree with the Taliban [his empty speechifying] - Iron Munro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Hodar

One can only imagine what those green eyes have witnessed all these years in that hell hole over there. You wouldn’t look much better.


31 posted on 06/22/2009 3:57:27 PM PDT by headstamp 2 (Spay or Neuter your liberal today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Best color film, ever.


32 posted on 06/22/2009 3:58:13 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

The Kodachrome in use today is somewhat different from the original Kodachrome, and its modifications, as well as its processing, are still proprietary.

Likely whoever is able to assemble all the rights, “ingredients” and process, will be able to set whatever price they want. But it will be decidedly high end, as other film makers will provide for the low end market. Even the high end users will do “practice” shots with digital and low end film, to conserve their Kodachrome as much as possible.


33 posted on 06/22/2009 4:06:59 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
I've used Kodachrome since July 1960 and totally love it. When I went in the U.S. Peace Corps in 1966, I took 50 36 exposure rolls of Kodachrome 64 with me and used every one.

One of my favorite example pictures is at the following URL

The image is a scan of a 40 year old slide, so it is a little kinky but still a fun shot of little Teraza, in Kaphuka Village, Dedza District, Central Region of Malawi in Central Africa.

Here's me and my little house about 50 feet from the picture taken of Teraza.

Kodachrome - R.I.P. You made us all better photographers.

34 posted on 06/22/2009 4:18:02 PM PDT by jws3sticks (Zer0 and Hillary can take a very long walk on a very short pier, anytime, and the sooner the better!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

“When I think back
On all the crap I learned in high school
It’s a wonder
I can think at all
And though my lack of edu-—cation
Hasn’t hurt me none
I can read the writing on the wall

Kodachrome
They give us those nice bright colors
They give us the greens of summers
Makes you think all the world’s a sunny day, Oh yeah
I got a Nikon camera
I love to take a photograph
So mama don’t take my Kodachrome away

If you took all the girls I knew
When I was single
And brought them all together for one night
I know they’d never match
my sweet imagination
everything looks WORSE in black and white

Kodachrome
They give us those nice bright colors
They give us the greens of summers
Makes you think all the world’s a sunny day, Oh yeah
I got a Nikon camera
I love to take a photograph
So mama don’t take my Kodachrome away

Mama don’t take my Kodachrome away
Mama don’t take my Kodachrome away
Mama don’t take my Kodachrome away

Mama don’t take my Kodachrome
Mama don’t take my Kodachrome
Mama don’t take my Kodachrome away

Mama don’t take my Kodachrome
Leave your boy so far from home
Mama don’t take my Kodachrome away
Mama don’t take my Kodachrome

Mama don’t take my Kodachrome away”


35 posted on 06/22/2009 4:54:33 PM PDT by Checkers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fso301
Ironically, it was Kodak that invented digital photography, but shelved it since they had billions invested in film production Although they don't get much good press from the digimags, they make excellent digital cameras today. Both of mine turn out super pics and HD videos.

They also had the best copier on the market, but were sued by Xerox and dropped out.

They also invented the best instant camera system/film ever, but were sued by Polaroid and dropped out. Curiously, Kodak supplied Polaroid with all of their film at the time.

Kodak also invented and is yet to fully market the very best media screen ever, based upon OLED technology, but where is it? An Oled screen on a digital camera or TV screen or video camera would look so Kodachrome sharp and bright you can see it in bright sunlight.

Kodak has had years of bad luck, poor choices and bad management. Too bad. It was a great company once. I know. I worked there for 36 years.

36 posted on 06/22/2009 4:55:25 PM PDT by Paulus Invictus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: squarebarb

Fuji actually copied Kodak film and is one of the reasons for Kodak’s loss of market share.


37 posted on 06/22/2009 4:58:22 PM PDT by Paulus Invictus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Paulus Invictus

Paulus,

Nice post. Wow 36 years! The stories you could tell...


38 posted on 06/22/2009 5:21:44 PM PDT by SanFranDan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

For maybe 20 years I used Kodachrome almost exclusively. I guess I haven’t put a roll of it through in at least 10 years but I still feel like I just lost an old friend.


39 posted on 06/22/2009 5:24:20 PM PDT by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
Likely whoever is able to assemble all the rights, “ingredients” and process, will be able to set whatever price they want. But it will be decidedly high end, as other film makers will provide for the low end market. Even the high end users will do “practice” shots with digital and low end film, to conserve their Kodachrome as much as possible.

Well if it's going to be a high end film, whoever manufactures it should manufacture Kodachrome 25 and 220 roll. I've heard good things about Fuji's Velvia for shooting landscapes, but Kodachrome still has superior warm tones for photographing people.

40 posted on 06/22/2009 6:23:21 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson