Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: George from New England

Huh? How do you come to THAT conclusion? What a leap directly into the abyss. Ultrasound is dangerous to the baby inside and if you have ever had one you will notice that the baby continuously tries to move away from the sonic head


8 posted on 06/22/2009 9:55:25 AM PDT by the long march
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: the long march

I know that a fish finder can be uncomfortable if you get to close to it when you are in the water so I would assume the same is true for an ultrasound...


11 posted on 06/22/2009 9:59:28 AM PDT by TSgt (Extreme vitriol and rancorous replies served daily. - Mike W USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: the long march

10 babies. I hadn’t noticed our babies moving during ultrasounds. I remember with two of ours that we tried to get movement so that we could see whether we were having girl or boy, but it didn’t work. I also don’t remember the doctors warning that ultrasounds are dangerous and that harm could come to our babies. Not even with the third or fourth ultrasounds in a pregnancy.


12 posted on 06/22/2009 10:06:31 AM PDT by petitfour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: the long march

***Ultrasound is dangerous to the baby inside....***

100% False!!! The only way it could be dangerous is if you transmit enough energy to heat the target or cause acoustical cavitations. Neither are done with the low levels in this type of ultrasound. It is no more dangerous than the radiowaves that are constantly passing through your body.


21 posted on 06/22/2009 10:56:13 AM PDT by Lord_Calvinus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson