Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/21/2009 2:57:39 PM PDT by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: reaganaut1

Ah. Interesting . . .


2 posted on 06/21/2009 2:59:39 PM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Whoops! Looks like we have a problem with “Big business” and “Big government” being in bed together 24/7.


3 posted on 06/21/2009 3:06:02 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Hey America! How's that "hope and change" thing working out? Are you scared yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

If Rep. Sensenbrenner thinks this smells funny, then it is definitely rotten. He’s a top-notch Congressman.


4 posted on 06/21/2009 3:06:35 PM PDT by 6323cd (Loyal Oppostion My Ass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Update on Recovery Act Lobbying Rules: New Limits on Special Interest Influence
White House Blog
FRIDAY, MAY 29TH, 2009 AT 5:35 PM

Posted by Jesse Lee. Another update from Norm Eisen, special counsel to the president for ethics and government reform, in the spirit of transparency as always:

I am writing with an update on the President’s March 20, 2009 Memorandum on Ensuring Responsible Spending of Recovery Act Funds. Section 3 of the Memorandum required all oral communications between federally registered lobbyists and government officials concerning Recovery Act policy to be disclosed on the Internet; barred registered lobbyists from having oral communications with government officials about specific Recovery Act projects or applications and instead required those communications to be in writing; and also required those written communications to be posted on the Internet.

That Memorandum instructed the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to review the initial 60 days of implementation of the stimulus lobbying restrictions, to evaluate the data, and to recommend modifications.

Following OMB’s review, the Administration has decided to make a number of changes to the rules that we think make them even tougher on special interests and more focused on merits-based decision making.

First, we will expand the restriction on oral communications to cover all persons, not just federally registered lobbyists. For the first time, we will reach contacts not only by registered lobbyists but also by unregistered ones, as well as anyone else exerting influence on the process. We concluded this was necessary under the unique circumstances of the stimulus program.

Second, we will focus the restriction on oral communications to target the scenario where concerns about merit-based decision-making are greatest –after competitive grant applications are submitted and before awards are made. Once such applications are on file, the competition should be strictly on the merits. To that end, comments (unless initiated by an agency official) must be in writing and will be posted on the Internet for every American to see.

Third, we will continue to require immediate internet disclosure of all other communications with registered lobbyists. If registered lobbyists have conversations or meetings before an application is filed, a form must be completed and posted to each agency’s website documenting the contact.

OMB will be consulting with agencies, outside experts and others about these principles and will publish detailed guidance, but we wanted to update interested parties on the outcome of the initial review. We consulted very broadly both within and outside of government (including as reflected in previous posts on the White House blog) and we are grateful to all those who participated in the process.

WEB SITE http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/Update-on-Recovery-Act-Lobbying-Rules-New-Limits-on-Special-Interest-Influence/


5 posted on 06/21/2009 3:12:39 PM PDT by Vendome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Oooops. Caught ya.


7 posted on 06/21/2009 3:27:16 PM PDT by HighlyOpinionated (Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann in 2012. With Liz Cheney as Secretary of State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1

Go get ‘em, Jim!


8 posted on 06/21/2009 3:28:09 PM PDT by freemama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
In any game, never play against the guys wearing the striped shirts - you can never win that way. In this case, in a three-way competitive industry, the Feds have issued 2 of the competitors with striped shirts. This needs to go to the Supreme Court for some kind of injunctive relief.

We were told to bail out GM and Chrysler to "save" them, then they promptly went bankrupt. All we did was prolong their demise - they should have removed the ventilator BEFORE we gave them any the medicine many of us knew would not work. I like metaphors, so it is like the doctor gave some medicine which cause the doctor to get sick.

9 posted on 06/21/2009 3:59:43 PM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: reaganaut1
Jim's a good guy and makes me proud of my state. Then there are Feingold, Kohl, Kagan, etc.
*sigh*
12 posted on 06/21/2009 4:59:52 PM PDT by 50cal Smokepole (Effective gun control involves effective recoil management)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson