[neverdem]

Op-Ed Contributor means this is a guest Op-Ed.

[stevie_d_64]

What is sad is that we’ll have to be right 100% of the time...

The bad guys will only have to be right once...

[theDentist]

I know Bush was supposed to recognize the threat, but nothing came of any efforts. Surely, this wuss will do nothing more than give speeches.

[GladesGuru]

““a world with no nuclear weapons””

Intellectual bastard son of “a world without guns”.

That, for the Liberals, retards, and the decerebrate, means a world where the strongest rule by force of crude weapons like swords.

For all females who support a disarmed world, consider that only Sam Colt made you equal to a man in terms of defense.

[null and void]

The same reasoning they have for everything (except gun control): If it isn’t 100% effective, why bother?

[BenLurkin]

Obama’s future vision of “a world with no nuclear weapons” is certainly...stupid.

Obama’s future vision of “a world with no nuclear weapons” is certainly...dangerous.

Obama’s future vision of “a world with no nuclear weapons” is certainly...suspicious.

[gaijin]

I heard that even today the detector must be within about **200 meters** for it to register the radioactive material...?!??!

[buccaneer81]

What about attack by a small plane? Given the impracticality of shooting down a tiny aircraft before it could detonate a bomb from the air, the best approach is to begin screening all domestic departures of small airplanes.

The author seems to think all general aviation flights originate at airports. I guess it would be a true revelation were he to discover that private citizens have grass landing strips in places like northern Maine, Nebraska and by golly, lakes in Minnesota and Alaska.

These eggheads think they know it all.