Historic relativism is as condemnable as moral relativism. Has Ron ever heard the phrase: “Strike while the iron is hot?” No…and you see why Ron is irrelevant and doesn’t get anything down.
By Ron’s gauge, how many years of prefect consistency in foreign policy will be required before we might take a stance against the worst of the worst thuggery...20, 50, 100 years? 1000 years?
and L. Ron Paul voted against condemning ahmadinejad when he spoke in NY.
I guess a dictator who wants America destroyed, Israel wiped off the map, denies the holocaust, and responsible
for thousands of deaths is just another guy who should have free speech.
L Ron Paul is a demagog and his supporters are delusional.
And just WHOSE interests was Dr. Paul elected to represent? And (allegedly) whose interests was the Pres__ent hired to represent?
Oh, that’s right... AMERICAN interests. I realize that Obambi only represents American interests when it suits his socialist agenda, but Dr. Paul is quite correct when he asserts that it is none of our OFFICIAL business what is happening in Iran. While we, on this forum, as PRIVATE CITIZENS, are fully free to express our opinions, our support for the dissidents and our loathing of the regime in Tehran, our GOVERNMENT is supposed to be looking out for these UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, not sticking its nose into the internal affairs of another nation, not for ANY reason. And, as someone mentioned, it is totally hypocritical to want to condemn one nation whilst ignoring even worse behavior in another, just because it supposedly supports us (even as it exports the Wahhabism brand of evil islam, which is so anti-American it should make your eyes water. Dr. Paul is correct and he is properly representing his employers, the Americans who elected him to office.
His Audit the Fed bill has over 200 co-sponsors.
And those Tea Parties? They were started by his supporters.