Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/19/2009 7:44:53 PM PDT by greatdefender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: greatdefender

Those that really really want to already do.

No laws regarding background checks or training effect them in any way.


2 posted on 06/19/2009 7:49:35 PM PDT by Eagle Eye (When they came for GM I did nothing because I was not a car dealer....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: greatdefender

“This bill would made a radical and very dangerous change in state law,” Goddard said at a Thursday press conference. “It would put our law enforcement officers at significant increased risk.”

I really don’t understand the logic in this statement, those who pose a significant threat to LE are already carrying guns as it is and 99% are most likely convicted felony already barred from guns by law.


3 posted on 06/19/2009 7:49:52 PM PDT by The Magical Mischief Tour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: greatdefender

I like the idea.

I love Sierra Vista, have been there many times. Traveled there every other week for years. Nice friendly folks. Beware of the drivers on the 1 long main street. Some are airplane pilots, and move.

Would love for Texas to have such a law. We are very pro gun anyway.


4 posted on 06/19/2009 7:50:33 PM PDT by Texas Fossil (Once a Republic, Now a State, Still Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: greatdefender
Her proposal drew alarm from Attorney General Terry Goddard along with a handful of police chiefs and sheriffs.

“This bill would made a radical and very dangerous change in state law,” Goddard said at a Thursday press conference. “It would put our law enforcement officers at significant increased risk.”

The unmitigated arrogance of some members of law enforcement. They believe only they are smart enough to handle firearms.

NOTE: I don't believe most members of law enforcement are anti-RKBA.

5 posted on 06/19/2009 7:52:25 PM PDT by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: greatdefender

That’s the way it should be across the nation.


6 posted on 06/19/2009 7:53:03 PM PDT by brushcop (SFC Sallie, CPL Long, LTHarris, SSG Brown, PVT Simmons KIA OIF lll&V, they died for you, honor them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: greatdefender

Good for Arizona. Criminals do already.


7 posted on 06/19/2009 7:53:51 PM PDT by eyedigress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: greatdefender

That’s the way it should be.


8 posted on 06/19/2009 7:58:08 PM PDT by wastedyears (Rock and roll ain't worth the name if it don't make ya strut)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: greatdefender

This only makes sense.

If you can legally own a gun, you should be able to carry it, and would qualify for a permit in most states anyway. Why in the hell should you need a permit?


10 posted on 06/19/2009 8:06:31 PM PDT by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: greatdefender

““This bill would made a radical and very dangerous change in state law,” Goddard said at a Thursday press conference. “It would put our law enforcement officers at significant increased risk.””

Someone must have pushed that chap’s Bravo Sierra button.


14 posted on 06/19/2009 8:17:57 PM PDT by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is essential to examine principles,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: greatdefender

How do law abiding citizens that exercise their 2nd Amendment rights put police at risk?

They damn well don’t. They are the same people with or without their weapons.

I wish to God they’d ask the people who say this point blank that question.


15 posted on 06/19/2009 8:21:14 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: greatdefender

Yesssss! [ fist pump ] Constitutional rights recognized without submitting a DNA sample and asking permission first. What a concept!


19 posted on 06/19/2009 8:38:00 PM PDT by Still Thinking (If ignorance is bliss, liberals must be ecstatic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: greatdefender

Well, the crooks are already carrying without permits. Why not the rest of us?


21 posted on 06/19/2009 8:46:11 PM PDT by GOPJ (...those who make non-violent revolution impossible make violent revolution inevitable.- JFK (Iran))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: greatdefender
Her proposal drew alarm from Attorney General Terry Goddard along with a handful of police chiefs and sheriffs. Because, just like the other libs, Goddard understands that government knows best how to manage the day to day affairs of your life; your job is to shut up and fork over your money so they can hire more libs to govern you even more thoroughly. Will no one rid us of these freedom-sucking lib parasites?
22 posted on 06/19/2009 9:13:16 PM PDT by Trod Upon (Obama: Making the Carter malaise look good. Misery Index in 3...2...1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: greatdefender

That is progress.


32 posted on 06/20/2009 3:18:45 PM PDT by 1010RD (First Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson