Well....If people can't afford to educate their children perhaps they should have them.
There are many government programs that should fit into that category and should be eliminated. Government schooling in my state is more than 50% of state and local budgets, and they get another 10% or more from the federal government.
Geeze! If you want to cut taxes, government schooling should be one of the first items to go.
Using your reasoning, if parents can't afford to educate their kids ( an **expected** and reasonable expense) or raise a retarded child ( an unexpected and catastrophic expense) then they shouldn't have children.
Mine have been educated quite well, thanks.
I was referring to the woman and her retarded child, for whom I do not wish to pay.