Where in that vapid, silly document you kindly linked for me does it say that a state of war exists between the United States and the Republic of Iraq? Hate to sound like a scold, but words mean things!What is ironic about your post is that yes, words do mean things.
Resolution:The U.S. Congress yesterday passed a resolution authorizing President Bush to use the Armed Forces of the United States against Iraq. Dictionary.com:1. a conflict carried on by force of arms, as between nations or between parties within a nation;
The resolution does contain the definition of the word "war". Yet you ignore it and call it vapid.
As I said the resolution was a Constitutional declaration of war.
BTW don't worry, because you don't sound like a "scold". You instead sound like somebody who is incorrect.
My last post contained a quote from the article instead of a quote from the resolution. Here's the relevant quote from the resolution....
JOINT RESOLUTION: To authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against Iraq.
...and again the dictionary definition of the word, "war".
Dictionary.com:1. a conflict carried on by force of arms, as between nations or between parties within a nation;