Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: The Pack Knight

No, he isn’t. He has a clearly articulated set of principles and he walks his talk - and takes the heat for it.

Let’s put this to the test: all these 405 dipsticks voting for this resolution? Are they going to vote to involve the US in this crap in Iran?

No.

But boy oh boy, they want to be seen as pandering to the ‘correct’ side of the argument.

Paul is the only guy who had the guts to see this for what it was: cheap talk for PR purposes.


143 posted on 06/19/2009 1:45:53 PM PDT by NVDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: NVDave
Maybe somebody can explain this. On this thread, pro-interventionist freepers are condeming Ron Paul for voting against this resolution but on another thread these same interventionists are attacking Obama for supporting this "surrender" resolution. The mental gymnastics taken by the interventionist side are a sight to behold.
146 posted on 06/19/2009 1:54:04 PM PDT by Captain Kirk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson