[ScottinVA]

“But I think Obama must hear the message of the protests”

Sorry, but 0bama’s sentiments don’t rest with you. He favors Ahmadinejad and Khameini. You are just troublesome rabble rousers upsetting 0bama’s pizza night plans.

[Jeff Chandler]

So... the bottom line is: Obama must understand that Nut Job is a tyrant, and say nothing about it.

[Jeff Chandler]

[Pastelsbywelz]

Obama supporting anything either here or in Iran is the kiss of death. His popularity is waning in America thanks to the continual dialogue of the USA Conservatives with the press. The Conservatives are telling the true nature of Obama’s insane presidential decrees. We look forward to the 2010 elections to over throw this so called “Muslim POTUS.” So called by himself .Obama is after power for himself and his Democrat Socialist Party of which he is the titular head.

[rrrod]

Sorry pal...but Obama is on the side of Ahmadinejad and Khameini. They are his kind of people.

[bmwcyle]

Ping.

[GBA]

When obama and Pelosi, along with Dean and many other demonrats hear these accounts from Iran, they don't feel outrage or the need to help the protesters. They are jealously taking notes wishing they could do that sort of thing here to all the stooopid conservatives and others who oppose them doing what is “best” for us.

[SunkenCiv]

thanks neverdem.

This is the first time an American president did not interfere with Iran's situation -- and it's a good thing. In the past, U.S. support for the protestors led the Iranian government to punish the people more, accusing them of being spies for or taking money from the U.S. But I think Obama must hear the message of the protests: Ahmadinejad's government is a lie...

"And what's your point?"