Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tacticalogic
"Repeated observatoins and consistent results. The same thing that's produced every other accepted physical constant that's used in scientific and engineering calculations."

Unfortunately, those observations and results have not been performed under the radiometric decay conditions that you are extrapolating.

And again, dynamic time is different from radiometric time, significantly so in this scenario, and you are equating the two. That is why I referred you to post #27.

Finally, the ZPE is probably involved in radiometric decay energies and is certainly involved in radiometric decay rates.

211 posted on 06/18/2009 4:36:31 PM PDT by GourmetDan (Eccl 10:2 - The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies ]


To: GourmetDan
Unfortunately, those observations and results have not been performed under the radiometric decay conditions that you are extrapolating.

What condition is it I'm "extrapolating"? Have the results you're speculating about ever been observed at all under any conditions?

212 posted on 06/18/2009 4:44:20 PM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson