[count-your-change]

When someone says that Darwinism and Scripture are not contradictory it always means the Scriptures must be “allegory, and metaphor” in a sense that agrees with or allows for Darwinism to stand untouched and pristine.

How Romans 5:19 could be, “For as by one man's disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous.”, allergorized to be a ‘perfect fit or compatible’ with Darwinism, I have yet to hear.

And asking doesn't garner explanation but name calling for asking.

[tpanther]

“And asking doesn’t garner explanation but name calling for asking.”

Liberals project-alot.

I asked him about hissy-fit matthews and his settled science comments when he was spewing spittle about evolution, and the reply from Bucky was this has nothing to do with the subject of evolution and that I’m a closet liberal for using leftist tactics!

I guess you just have to remember that this is from someone that actually argues that believing what God says in the Bible makes a Christian weak in his faith.

Buck W. = the walking talking poster-boy for failed liberal public indoctrination masquerading as education. Perhaps he’s in a contest to have his pic. captioned next to the NEA in Webster’s?